MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Nanox.AI vs Ultromics EchoGo

EchoGo Heart Failure flags HFpEF from one apical four-chamber clip in adults over 25 with ejection fraction of 50% or more (K240013, decided September 23, 2024), and the vendor states 90.3% sensitivity and 86.1% specificity from that filing. EchoGo Amyloidosis (K240860) screens adults 65 and over with heart failure. Ultromics lists HIPAA, GDPR and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 on its trust center, and CPT Category III code 0932T is assigned to the heart failure tool.

Ultromics reads transthoracic echo and Nanox's three listed solutions all read CT, so an echo lab and a CT radiology department are different buyers. Nanox's HealthCCSng takes non-contrast chest CT and returns a calcium category, and the AI page says results reach the radiology report and EMR through PACS, EMR and report-system connections without naming brands. Radiology departments mining routine CT for calcium buy it, and cardiology services with an echo lab buy Ultromics.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Nanox.AI logo

Nanox.AI

by Nano-X Imaging

CT AI for opportunistic screening: coronary calcium, vertebral fractures and liver fat on routine CT scans, for radiology departments.

Ultromics EchoGo logo

Ultromics EchoGo

by Ultromics

FDA-cleared AI on echocardiograms that flags heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and screens for cardiac amyloidosis.

When to pick each one

Nanox.AI

  • Coronary calcium category from non-contrast chest CT
  • Results go into radiology report and EMR
Read the full Nanox.AI review

Ultromics EchoGo

  • HFpEF flag from one apical four-chamber echo clip
  • Amyloidosis screen for adults 65 and over with heart failure
  • HIPAA and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 on trust center
Read the full Ultromics EchoGo review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Nanox.AI

35of 100

Competitive

Ultromics EchoGo

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Nanox.AI and Ultromics EchoGo
DimensionNanox.AIUltromics EchoGoDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 106 / 10-6
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Nanox.AI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Ultromics EchoGo

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Nanox.AI

FDA decisions

Show 7 more

Ultromics EchoGo

FDA decisions

Show 1 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecNanox.AIUltromics EchoGo
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQn/aGB

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.