MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Philips Imaging AI vs TeraRecon

A cardiac CT service on Philips scanners that wants coronary calcium scoring has one question to settle. TeraRecon's regulatory page limits its Cardiovascular.Calcification.CT algorithm, cleared October 2025, to GE or Siemens CT, so that one algorithm is unavailable on Philips CT. The limit covers that algorithm only. Philips's AV Cardiac CT (K260169, March 2026) and AV Vascular (January 2026) are listed as cardiac and vascular CT workstations, and Precise Image handles CT reconstruction on the same scanners.

A radiology group scanning on several vendors that wants outside algorithms run side by side fits TeraRecon. Its AI Framework is described as a vendor-agnostic hosting platform with multiple algorithms per study, comparison with priors and physician review before results are committed. The partner page shows 16 logos and nothing more about any of them. TeraRecon's own cleared algorithms cover the aorta on CT, cardiac chambers on MR, coronary calcification and neuro perfusion.

A cardiology department buying ultrasound meets DiA LVivo in the Philips line, which does automated cardiac measurements and image-quality guidance. TeraRecon's coverage is CT and MR.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Philips AI-enabled imaging portfolio across MR, CT, ultrasound and cardiology, including DiA and TomTec. 49 Philips entries on the FDA AI-device list plus 12 from DiA and TomTec.

TeraRecon logo

TeraRecon

by ConcertAI · founded 1997

Advanced CT and MR visualization with cardiac, aorta and neuro AI, plus a vendor-agnostic platform to run third-party AI.

When to pick each one

Philips Imaging AI

  • Philips CT and MR reconstruction in the scanner
  • AV Cardiac CT and AV Vascular workstations
  • Echo measurements from DiA LVivo
Read the full Philips Imaging AI review

TeraRecon

  • AI Framework hosts outside algorithms, 16 partner logos
  • Vendor: Intuition is cloud SaaS
  • Cardiac MR chambers and aorta CT algorithms
Read the full TeraRecon review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Philips Imaging AI

39of 100

Competitive

TeraRecon

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Philips Imaging AI and TeraRecon
DimensionPhilips Imaging AITeraReconDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal12 / 128.4 / 12+3.6
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Philips Imaging AI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprise and OEMn/an/aNo public price. Sold with scanners and ultrasound systems on enterprise and OEM contracts.

TeraRecon

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Philips Imaging AI

FDA decisions

Show 9 more

TeraRecon

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecPhilips Imaging AITeraRecon
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a1997
HQNLUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.