MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Qure.ai vs RapidAI

Emergency teams reading head CT can put both on the list. Qure's qER holds a 510(k) for head CT triage, with qER-Quant and qER-CTA cleared later. Rapid has separate 510(k)s for Rapid ICH, Rapid ASPECTS and Rapid LVO, and adds CT perfusion plus a mobile app with case summaries. The vendor claims 97% sensitivity and 96% specificity for Rapid LVO, and a scoping review puts proximal LVO sensitivity across tools at 78% to 97%.

Qure suits a different hospital. A chest X-ray queue gets qXR-LN, cleared for radiologists, pulmonologists and ER physicians reading adult frontal chest radiographs, and lung nodule follow-up on CT runs through qCT LN Quant. TB programs can cite the WHO endorsement the vendor reports from 2021, and an independent 12-product evaluation put qXR v3 at 95.5% sensitivity with 48.7% specificity at one threshold. Qure drops off the list for a stroke center that wants perfusion maps and ASPECTS on one platform.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

RapidAI logo

RapidAI

by RapidAI · founded 2017

Imaging platform for stroke, aneurysm, aortic and pulmonary embolism care, with CT perfusion, LVO and ICH modules.

When to pick each one

Qure.ai

  • qXR-LN 510(k) cleared for adult frontal chest radiographs
  • qER head CT triage plus qER-CTA
  • Vendor cites WHO endorsement for TB screening
Read the full Qure.ai review

RapidAI

  • CT perfusion, ASPECTS, LVO and ICH modules
  • Rapid LVO cleared as triage and notification software
  • 510(k) history back to 2013 as iSchemaView RAPID
Read the full RapidAI review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice

RapidAI

65of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Qure.ai and RapidAI
DimensionQure.aiRapidAIDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.83.9 / 7.8-3.9
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 55 / 5-2.5
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

RapidAI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Plann/an/aEnterprise.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecQure.aiRapidAI
Free tierNo / unverifiedYes
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2017
HQINUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.