MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Qure.ai vs ScreenPoint Transpara

ScreenPoint's Transpara has a randomized trial behind it. ScreenPoint says Transpara was the AI in MASAI, a Lund University randomized study published in the Lancet, and reports more than 105,000 women with sensitivity of 80.5% against 73.8% for standard double reading at 98.5% specificity. It also cites a 29% rise in cancer detection and a 44% cut in workload, drawn from separate analyses. The vendor calls Transpara vendor agnostic across FFDM and DBT systems, and a density tool is cleared under K232096. A program that double-reads screening mammograms matches the Swedish MASAI setting.

Qure's qXR chest X-ray tools, qER head CT triage and qCT lung nodule volumetry fit a hospital imaging department or a TB program, and the vendor reports registration in more than 85 countries. Screening mammography and chest or head CT sit in separate reading rooms, so the two tools reach separate buyers.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

ScreenPoint Transpara logo

ScreenPoint Transpara

by ScreenPoint Medical

Transpara Breast AI: cancer detection support, density and risk tools for 2D and 3D mammograms.

When to pick each one

Qure.ai

  • Chest X-ray, head CT and lung nodule CT products
  • qXR-LN nodule detection 510(k) cleared
  • CE Class IIb under MDR for qXR v4.0
Read the full Qure.ai review

ScreenPoint Transpara

  • Transpara reads 2D and 3D mammograms
  • Eight 510(k)s, latest decided in August 2026
  • Randomized MASAI trial used Transpara, per vendor
Read the full ScreenPoint Transpara review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice

ScreenPoint Transpara

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Qure.ai and ScreenPoint Transpara
DimensionQure.aiScreenPoint TransparaDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 126 / 12+2.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

ScreenPoint Transpara

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Virtual demo and contact only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecQure.aiScreenPoint Transpara
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQINNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.