MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Qure.ai vs TeraRecon

For a health system that wants head CT alerts, TeraRecon is the weaker fit. Its seven algorithmic openFDA records cover T1 and T2 mapping, structural heart, brain perfusion (two decisions), cardiac chambers on MR, the aorta on CT and coronary calcification. Qure's qER (K200921, June 17, 2020) is cleared as QAS CT triage, and qER-CTA (K251610) followed on September 8, 2025.

TeraRecon says its AI Framework runs several algorithms per study, compares priors and holds results for physician review before they are committed. That makes it the host for a hospital IT group that wants one vendor-agnostic platform, with its own Aorta.CT (K243158, January 23, 2025) segmenting the aorta on adult CTA.

Qure is the pick for a lung nodule program. qCT LN Quant (K240740, August 16, 2024) handles volumetry and tracking, and qCT Lung v1.0 (K261517, September 14, 2026) is the newest of its ten openFDA records. Qure's regulatory page says images are de-identified before cloud processing or handled on premise inside the covered entity.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

TeraRecon logo

TeraRecon

by ConcertAI · founded 1997

Advanced CT and MR visualization with cardiac, aorta and neuro AI, plus a vendor-agnostic platform to run third-party AI.

When to pick each one

Qure.ai

  • qER head CT triage, K200921
  • qCT LN Quant for nodule tracking
  • HIPAA de-identification before cloud processing
Read the full Qure.ai review

TeraRecon

  • Aorta.CT segmentation, K243158
  • Hosts third-party AI algorithms
  • Physician review before results are committed
Read the full TeraRecon review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice

TeraRecon

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Qure.ai and TeraRecon
DimensionQure.aiTeraReconDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.20 / 18.2+12.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

TeraRecon

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

TeraRecon

FDA decisions

Show 2 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecQure.aiTeraRecon
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a1997
HQINUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.