MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Viz.ai vs VUNO

Viz.ai sells to health systems that coordinate stroke and vascular care across hospitals. VUNO sells to radiology departments that want chest X-ray triage or brain MR volumetry. The vendor says the Viz.ai platform alerts care teams through a mobile app and group messaging. ContaCT was granted De Novo DEN170073 on February 13, 2018 for large-vessel occlusion on CTA. Viz.ai's July 2026 release says 13 FDA clearances, while openFDA and De Novo list 12 records, 10 510(k)s and 2 De Novos. A 2025 Translational Stroke Research meta-analysis of 12 studies and 15,595 patients found shorter door-to-groin (SMD -0.47) and door-in-door-out (SMD -0.49) times, with no significant difference in clinical outcomes. VUNO's two openFDA decisions are K241439 (November 15, 2024, product code QFM, pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax triage) and K231398 (October 4, 2023, QIH, brain MR volumetry). Its chest page describes support for five major findings, wider than the FDA decision. A stroke network and a chest X-ray reading room are different buyers.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Viz.ai logo

Viz.ai

by Viz.ai · founded 2016

Care coordination platform with FDA-cleared imaging AI for stroke, vascular and cardiac conditions.

VU

VUNO

by VUNO Inc. · founded 2014

FDA-cleared AI for chest X-ray triage and brain MR volumetry, plus Korean-approved bone age and retinal screening tools.

When to pick each one

Viz.ai

  • De Novo DEN170073 for LVO triage, 2018
  • Meta-analysis of 12 studies shows faster door-to-groin times
  • Viz.ai Trust Center lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001
Read the full Viz.ai review

VUNO

  • Chest X-ray triage for pleural effusion and pneumothorax
  • Brain MR volumetry cleared as K231398
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and 27701:2019 listed in its privacy policy
Read the full VUNO review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Viz.ai

89of 100

Top-ranked

VUNO

73of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Viz.ai and VUNO
DimensionViz.aiVUNODifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.218.2 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.87.8 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal12 / 128.4 / 12+3.6
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Viz.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Sold to health systems after a demo request.

VUNO

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecViz.aiVUNO
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20162014
HQUSKR

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.