Arintra

What does the vendor describe?

Per the homepage and platform page, Autonomous Medical Coding is specialty-specific, covers "23+ specialties" and works in ambulatory, emergency, diagnostic and inpatient settings. Most charts go straight to billing. Clinical Documentation Intelligence flags gaps before the claim goes out, Denial Intelligence drafts appeals from the coding audit trail, and a revenue view breaks results down by specialty, provider and line.

Where is it based, who runs it and who funds it?

The homepage says "Headquartered in San Francisco" while its footer address is in Austin, Texas. HIT Consultant says Austin with engineering in Bengaluru, and MobiHealthNews and PitchBook say San Francisco. Founders are Nitesh Shroff (CEO) and Preeti Bhargava (CTO). PitchBook gives 2019 as the founding year and Tracxn gives 2020.

Axios reported a $21M Series A in August 2025 led by Peak XV Partners. HIT Consultant reported a Series B of about $25M in August 2026 led by Define Ventures, with Y Combinator, Ten13, Counterpart, Yale New Haven Ventures and Endeavor Ventures. A $51M total circulates, but HIT Consultant states no total. The vendor names Mercy Health, First Medical Associates, UC Davis Health and Vanova Health, with no customer count, and claims a UC Davis audit "approximately 50% faster".

How are the KLAS score and the accuracy figures sourced?

• The KLAS score. Arintra published it on its blog, comparing 93* with an 81.1 Best in KLAS software average, and the KLAS report itself was not reviewed.
• The homepage claims "96% coding accuracy" and "82-86%" of charts flowing through automatically. The platform page defines neither.
• A Mercy Health testimonial gives 5.1% revenue uplift, 43% fewer coding denials and 88% direct to billing, none defined.
• A First Medical Associates physician quotes "4x ROI in six months".

What do the EHR, compliance and price statements say?

The homepage lists Epic (Toolbox), athenahealth (Marketplace), eClinicalWorks, Oracle Cerner, Meditech, NextGen and Allscripts, and says Arintra integrates with all major EHRs. It claims HITRUST e1 certification. HIPAA and SOC 2 are not mentioned on the homepage or platform page.

Arintra publishes no price. RFP.wiki, which labels its page estimated and not official, describes a sales-led model that starts with a proof of value and uses custom fees.

The verdict

A group comparing autonomous coding vendors has the KLAS spotlight alone as outside evidence, reported through the vendor's blog. The 96% and 82 to 86% figures stay the vendor's until defined, and a buyer who wants a SOC 2 report has only the HITRUST e1 claim on the vendor's pages.