eCART vs Bayesian Health
Hospitals shopping for inpatient early-warning software meet two different cleared claims. Bayesian Health's K250680, cleared April 30, 2026, covers sepsis developing within 24 hours in adults and puts a Sepsis Risk High flag in the EHR. eCART's K233253 covers death or ICU transfer in hospitalized ward patients 18 and older. Bayesian's platform also lists deterioration among its target areas, but the clearance covers the sepsis flag. Of these two, only Bayesian has a sepsis clearance, and only eCART has a ward-deterioration clearance. A Yale New Haven analysis of more than 362,000 ward encounters ranked eCART most accurate of six scores, with eCART developers among the authors. Bayesian cites a 2022 Nature Medicine study of its TREWS predecessor, prospective and observational, reporting 18% lower in-hospital mortality when alerts were acted on. The vendor does not say whether the cleared flag matches that version. Medicare's add-on payment of up to $61.84 per eligible fee-for-service inpatient case goes to the hospital.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

eCART
by AgileMD
Early warning software that scores hospitalized ward patients for risk of deterioration from EHR data, for use by trained clinicians.

Bayesian Health
by Bayesian Health
Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.
When to pick each one
eCART
- Scores ward patients for death or ICU transfer
- Best accuracy of six scores at Yale New Haven
Bayesian Health
- Sepsis-only 510(k) flag, K250680
- EHR-native Sepsis Risk High flag
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
eCART
56of 100
Bayesian Health
33of 100
| Dimension | eCART | Bayesian Health | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 12 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 10 / 10 | 0 / 10 | +10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 0 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 0 / 4.8 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 21 / 21 | 8.4 / 21 | +12.6 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 6 / 12 | -3 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
eCART
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. There is no pricing page; the site offers a demo request only. |
Bayesian Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
eCART
FDA decisions
K233253 (opens in new tab)510(k)2024-06-21
eCARTv5 Clinical Deterioration Suite (eCART)
Peer-reviewed
5 PubMed records name eCART.
- Early Warning Scores With and Without Artificial Intelligence. (opens in new tab)
- Multicenter Development and Prospective Validation of eCARTv5: A Gradient Boosted Machine Learning Early Warning Score. (opens in new tab)
- DETERIO-LLM: enhancing traditional deterioration risk scores with clinical context and advanced reasoning. (opens in new tab)
Bayesian Health
FDA decisions
K250680 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-30
Bayesian Health Sepsis Flagging Device
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | eCART | Bayesian Health |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
