MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

eCART vs Ceribell

Ward medicine leaders who want a cleared deterioration score get eCART, and it comes with a published comparison. A 2024 JAMA Network Open study of six early warning scores at Yale New Haven Health, covering more than 362,000 ward encounters, ranked it most accurate, and its authors include eCART developers. The clearance (K233253) is for hospitalized adults on wards, and access runs through a demo request.

Ceribell goes to hospitals, ICUs and emergency departments that want point-of-care EEG: a bedside headband and recorder, seizure detection the vendor says covers 25-week preterm neonates to adults, and a delirium monitor. The company is public (Nasdaq: CBLL) and reported 712 active accounts and $28.1 million revenue for the second quarter of 2026. Sixteen 510(k) records sit under its name. Ward deterioration scoring and EEG-based seizure and delirium detection answer different clinical questions, and Ceribell's terms run one year, renewing yearly unless the hospital gives 90 days' notice.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

eCART logo

eCART

by AgileMD

Early warning software that scores hospitalized ward patients for risk of deterioration from EHR data, for use by trained clinicians.

Ceribell logo

Ceribell

by Ceribell

Point-of-care EEG headband with AI seizure detection and a delirium monitor, for hospitals, ICUs and emergency departments.

When to pick each one

eCART

  • FDA-cleared K233253 for hospitalized ward adults
  • Demo-request access, no published price
Read the full eCART review

Ceribell

  • Point-of-care EEG headband with seizure detection
  • Public company, Nasdaq CBLL
  • Delirium monitor cleared December 2025
Read the full Ceribell review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

eCART

56of 100

Solid choice

Ceribell

49of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for eCART and Ceribell
DimensioneCARTCeribellDifference
FDA clearance12 / 1212 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers21 / 2114.7 / 21+6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 94.5 / 9-4.5
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

eCART

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. There is no pricing page; the site offers a demo request only.

Ceribell

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Purchase terms: one-year initial term, auto-renewing yearly unless 90 days notice.

Evidence

Ceribell

FDA decisions

Show 11 more

Peer-reviewed

4 PubMed records name Ceribell.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpeceCARTCeribell
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.