Anumana vs Bayesian Health
Anumana's ECG-AI reads a standard 12-lead ECG and flags low ejection fraction (K250652), pulmonary hypertension (K252360) and cardiac amyloidosis (K253801), delivered as a notification in the EHR. The vendor says CPT III codes make it eligible for reimbursement. A pragmatic trial of its decision support tool is listed in Am Heart J Plus 2026, and many Anumana papers have Mayo or nference authors. Bayesian Health's sepsis device (K250680, April 2026) monitors EHR data continuously and shows a Sepsis Risk High flag for adults. The 2022 Nature Medicine study covered 764,707 encounters in five hospitals, but it studied the TREWS system the device descends from, and whether the cleared flag matches that version is open. The 18% lower in-hospital mortality when alerts were acted on is the vendor's observational claim. From October 2026 Medicare's add-on payment gives a hospital up to $61.84 per eligible fee-for-service inpatient case. A cardiology department catching low ejection fraction on routine ECGs buys Anumana, and a sepsis committee flagging inpatients buys Bayesian.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Anumana
by Anumana
ECG-AI software that flags low ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac amyloidosis from standard 12-lead ECGs.

Bayesian Health
by Bayesian Health
Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.
When to pick each one
Anumana
- Three cleared ECG-AI algorithms on standard 12-lead ECGs
- Pragmatic trial listed in Am Heart J Plus 2026
Bayesian Health
- Continuous sepsis flag, cleared April 2026
- Medicare add-on payment up to $61.84 per case
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Anumana
37of 100
Bayesian Health
33of 100
| Dimension | Anumana | Bayesian Health | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 12 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 0 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 0 / 4.8 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 14.7 / 21 | 8.4 / 21 | +6.3 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 6 / 12 | -3 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Anumana
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo request only. |
Bayesian Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Anumana
FDA decisions
K253801 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-07
ECG-AI Cardiac Amyloidosis (CA) 12-Lead Algorithm (1040)
K252360 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-03-28
ECG-AI Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) 12-Lead algorithm (1020)
K250652 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-07-28
ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction (LEF) 12-Lead algorithm (1010)
K232699 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-09-28
Low Ejection Fraction AI-ECG Algorithm
Peer-reviewed
3 PubMed records name Anumana.
- A Pragmatic Trial Evaluating the Impact of the Anumana Clinical Decision Support Tool for Guideline-Directed Management of Heart Failure (ACT-HF): Clinical trial design and methods. (opens in new tab)
- Comment on "A pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of the anumana clinical decision support tool for guideline-directed management of heart failure (ACT-HF): Clinical trial design and methods". (opens in new tab)
- Identification and risk stratification of coronary disease by artificial intelligence-enabled ECG. (opens in new tab)
Bayesian Health
FDA decisions
K250680 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-30
Bayesian Health Sepsis Flagging Device
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Anumana | Bayesian Health |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
