MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Anumana vs PERISCOPE

A US hospital that requires an FDA decision before buying can consider only Anumana, whose newest ECG-AI clearance, for cardiac amyloidosis, was decided in April 2026. The vendor says its low ejection fraction algorithm is available for clinical use in the US and EU, and a cardiology department is the one that adopts it.

PERISCOPE is sold to hospital surgical departments, and Deventer Ziekenhuis and Amsterdam UMC supply its testimonials. The vendor says it is CE-marked as a Class IIa device under EU MDR and states no FDA status. It predicts post-operative bacterial infection risk 7 and 30 days after surgery from existing EHR data, with models fitted per hospital. A study in Lancet Regional Health Europe in 2025 was retrospective: 253,010 procedures at three hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium, 30-day AUROC of 0.82, 0.82 and 0.91, with two authors at Healthplus.ai. The vendor says implementation takes 8 to 12 weeks depending on the EHR.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Anumana logo

Anumana

by Anumana

ECG-AI software that flags low ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac amyloidosis from standard 12-lead ECGs.

PERISCOPE logo

PERISCOPE

by Healthplus.ai

PERISCOPE predicts postoperative bacterial infection risk 7 and 30 days after surgery from EHR data.

When to pick each one

Anumana

  • Newest ECG-AI clearance dated April 2026
  • Vendor says LEF available in US and EU
Read the full Anumana review

PERISCOPE

  • Vendor says CE-marked Class IIa for infection risk
  • Vendor says implementation takes 8 to 12 weeks
Read the full PERISCOPE review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Anumana

37of 100

Competitive

PERISCOPE

15of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for Anumana and PERISCOPE
DimensionAnumanaPERISCOPEDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 218.4 / 21+6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Anumana

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo request only.

PERISCOPE

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAnumanaPERISCOPE
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSNL

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.