Anumana vs Navina

Navina is sold to value-based primary care groups, and KLAS comments describe a per-member-per-month fee. It reconciles EHR, HIE and claims data into chart summaries, suggests HCC codes at the visit and tracks care gaps. Epic, athenahealth and Veradigm are named on its homepage, and Privia Health and Agilon Health appear among its logos. The KLAS comments are unrated excerpts. One reads "Our physicians really like Navina", another "Navina's support overpromises and underdelivers". The vendor-published Phyx report claims 40% less chart review time on complex visits.

A hospital's cardiology unit is where Anumana lands. The vendor says its ECG-AI deploys within EHRs, names no EHR, and says it is eligible for reimbursement today.

A health system with both primary care and cardiology could buy each for its own department. A group paid on risk adjustment would look at Navina first.