Apricot vs DeepScribe
A community oncology group is the DeepScribe buyer and a home health agency is Apricot's, so the two answer different purchases. DeepScribe is built for oncology, lists OncoEMR and iKnowMed, links an Epic integration page, and adds pre-charting and coding support. It posts no price, and third-party estimates, some from competitors, run about $350 to $500 per provider per month on annual contracts plus setup, currency not stated. The homepage shows a 2025 KLAS Spotlight score of 98.8 that the vendor displays. Apricot puts documentation, coding and QA for post-acute care in one platform, and the vendor reports up to 85% less charting time with no method given. On security, DeepScribe shows SOC 2 and HIPAA badges, and Apricot says its Type II audit is complete.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Apricot
by Apricot Health
AI documentation, coding and QA platform for home health agencies, covering OASIS visits and ICD-10 coding.
DeepScribe
by DeepScribe Inc. · founded 2017
Ambient AI scribe made for oncology, with pre-charting and coding support.
When to pick each one
Apricot
- Documentation, coding and QA for post-acute care
- Vendor-reported 85% less charting time
DeepScribe
- Built for oncology, lists OncoEMR and iKnowMed
- Third-party estimate $350 to $500 monthly, currency not stated
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Apricot
22of 100
DeepScribe
35of 100
| Dimension | Apricot | DeepScribe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 13 / 13 | 13 / 13 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | -5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 0 / 5 | +2.5 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 | -6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Apricot
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Book a demo or contact sales. Trial and refund not stated. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from apricothealth.ai (opens in new tab).
DeepScribe
Quote only, no public price.
Evidence
Apricot
No FDA decision, peer-reviewed study or community post in our record.
DeepScribe
Community
5 posts sourced: 3 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Apricot | DeepScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | 2017 |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.
