Bayesian Health vs Navina
An inpatient sepsis lead is Bayesian Health's buyer. The software holds FDA 510(k) K250680, cleared April 30, 2026, and shows a "Sepsis Risk High" flag in the EHR when an adult 18 or older is at risk of developing sepsis within 24 hours. The sepsis flag descends from TREWS. Adams and colleagues published a 2022 Nature Medicine study of TREWS across five hospitals and 764,707 encounters, and the vendor's release reports 18% lower in-hospital mortality when alerts were acted on, from an observational design rather than a randomized trial. The vendor also says real-world customers saw a 5.5% absolute mortality reduction. Bayesian has no public price.
A primary care medical director in value-based contracts is Navina's buyer. The homepage lists chart summaries with source evidence, HCC and risk-adjustment suggestions at the visit, and care-gap closure. Those are primary care chart tasks, so a sepsis lead on an inpatient service and a risk-adjustment lead on an attributed population are separate buyers for these two products.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bayesian Health
by Bayesian Health
Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.

Navina
by Navina · founded 2018
AI copilot for chart review, risk adjustment and care gaps in primary care and value-based care groups.
When to pick each one
Bayesian Health
- FDA 510(k) K250680, cleared April 30, 2026
- Sepsis Risk High flag shown in the EHR
- Adults 18 and over, sepsis within 24 hours
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Bayesian Health
33of 100
Navina
36of 100
| Dimension | Bayesian Health | Navina | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 0 / 12 | +12 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | -1.7 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 3.4 / 4.8 | -3.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +8.4 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 6 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | -2.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 | -6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Bayesian Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Navina
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Bayesian Health
FDA decisions
K250680 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-30
Bayesian Health Sepsis Flagging Device
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.
Navina
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Bayesian Health | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | athenahealth, Epic, Veradigm |
| Founded | n/a | 2018 |
| HQ | US | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
