MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Bayesian Health vs Triomics

Memorial Sloan Kettering announced in November 2025 that it would deploy Triomics for trial matching and screening, and the same announcement states institutional financial interests in the company. The vendor says its PRISM tool screens patients against every active trial nightly and hands coordinators a cited worklist, reading oncology notes, pathology and scanned faxes for a cancer center trials office or oncology practice. It cites a 2024 npj Digital Medicine paper on its matching model and says accuracy is near 95%. Triomics lists Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed and Cerner on its homepage and says it is approved on the Epic App Marketplace. openFDA returns no match for the name, and the vendor makes no FDA claim.

Bayesian Health sells to hospital patient safety officers, and the vendor's release quotes customers at Cleveland Clinic and University of Rochester Medicine. Its flag is FDA-cleared and reads EHR data for sepsis risk. A trials office matching charts to protocols and a patient safety office watching for sepsis are separate purchases, because each product reads the record for a different question.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bayesian Health logo

Bayesian Health

by Bayesian Health

Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.

Triomics logo

Triomics

by triomics inc.

Oncology AI agents that match patients to clinical trials, prepare visits and curate cancer registries from notes, reports and faxes.

When to pick each one

Bayesian Health

  • FDA-cleared sepsis flag for adult inpatients
  • Cleveland Clinic and Rochester quoted in the vendor release
Read the full Bayesian Health review

Triomics

  • Trial matching, visit prep and registry curation for oncology
  • Lists Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed and Cerner
  • Deployment announced by Memorial Sloan Kettering
Read the full Triomics review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Bayesian Health

33of 100

Competitive

Triomics

12of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for Bayesian Health and Triomics
DimensionBayesian HealthTriomicsDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.83.4 / 4.8-3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 210 / 21+8.4
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal6 / 123 / 12+3
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Bayesian Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Triomics

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request and synthetic-data sandbox offered.

Evidence

Bayesian Health

FDA decisions

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.

Triomics

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecBayesian HealthTriomics
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed, Cerner
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.