Bayesian Health vs Triomics
Memorial Sloan Kettering announced in November 2025 that it would deploy Triomics for trial matching and screening, and the same announcement states institutional financial interests in the company. The vendor says its PRISM tool screens patients against every active trial nightly and hands coordinators a cited worklist, reading oncology notes, pathology and scanned faxes for a cancer center trials office or oncology practice. It cites a 2024 npj Digital Medicine paper on its matching model and says accuracy is near 95%. Triomics lists Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed and Cerner on its homepage and says it is approved on the Epic App Marketplace. openFDA returns no match for the name, and the vendor makes no FDA claim.
Bayesian Health sells to hospital patient safety officers, and the vendor's release quotes customers at Cleveland Clinic and University of Rochester Medicine. Its flag is FDA-cleared and reads EHR data for sepsis risk. A trials office matching charts to protocols and a patient safety office watching for sepsis are separate purchases, because each product reads the record for a different question.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bayesian Health
by Bayesian Health
Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.

Triomics
by triomics inc.
Oncology AI agents that match patients to clinical trials, prepare visits and curate cancer registries from notes, reports and faxes.
When to pick each one
Bayesian Health
- FDA-cleared sepsis flag for adult inpatients
- Cleveland Clinic and Rochester quoted in the vendor release
Triomics
- Trial matching, visit prep and registry curation for oncology
- Lists Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed and Cerner
- Deployment announced by Memorial Sloan Kettering
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Bayesian Health
33of 100
Triomics
12of 100
| Dimension | Bayesian Health | Triomics | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 0 / 12 | +12 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 2.8 / 5.6 | -2.8 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 3.4 / 4.8 | -3.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +8.4 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 6 / 12 | 3 / 12 | +3 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Bayesian Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Triomics
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo request and synthetic-data sandbox offered. |
Evidence
Bayesian Health
FDA decisions
K250680 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-30
Bayesian Health Sepsis Flagging Device
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.
Triomics
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Bayesian Health | Triomics |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed, Cerner |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
