CareBeam vs Evidently
CareBeam records encounters, drafts SOAP notes, referral letters and after-visit summaries, then audits charts for coding gaps before claims go out. It lists athenahealth, ModMed, Healthie, eClinicalWorks, Veradigm and Greenway, publishes a click-through BAA, and shows customers such as Clarity Pediatrics on its homepage. Its 98%+ accuracy claim is the vendor's. Evidently does not record visits. It reads the longitudinal chart, including outside records, and drafts notes such as admission H&Ps. University of Iowa Health Care, which the vendor lists as a customer, runs it inside Epic. A pilot published in Appl Clin Inform in May 2026 by Iowa clinicians compared 22 matched pairs of AI and provider admission notes, and the AI matched the principal diagnosis in 20. It was single-center and retrospective, and the vendor's whitepaper cites it. Neither company publishes a price. An independent athenahealth or ModMed practice that needs visits turned into notes cannot use Evidently, which does not record visits. A health system after chart review across the record looks to Evidently, since CareBeam drafts from the recorded visit.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
CareBeam
- Chart auditing and coding checks before claims go out
- Lists athenahealth, ModMed, Healthie and Greenway
Evidently
- Reads the full chart, including outside records
- Iowa pilot with 22 matched pairs of admission notes
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
CareBeam
34of 100
Evidently
20of 100
| Dimension | CareBeam | Evidently | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 7.8 / 13 | 0 / 13 | +7.8 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 10.5 / 21 | 6.3 / 21 | +4.2 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 4.8 / 12 | 4.8 / 12 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
CareBeam
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from trycarebeam.com (opens in new tab).
Evidently
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. No pricing page is published; the site offers Talk to Us and Book a live demo. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from evidently.com (opens in new tab).
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | CareBeam | Evidently |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | athenahealth, ModMed, Healthie, eClinicalWorks, Veradigm, Greenway | Epic |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.


