MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Digital Diagnostics vs Gleamer

Gleamer sells to radiology departments and imaging groups that read X-rays. BoneView flags fractures, dislocations and effusions, ChestView covers pneumothorax, nodules and effusion, and CT, MRI and mammography modules sit beside them. The vendor names Affidea, Hirslanden and Caritas Hospital Berlin among its sites and says its worklist prioritization plugs into the RIS. RadNet has owned Gleamer since March 2026. openFDA holds five Gleamer records, the newest ChestView US 1.1 in September 2026. A 2026 International Journal of Medical Informatics prospective crossover study examined three commercial musculoskeletal AI tools in real-world use, Gleamer's among them.

The vendor says LumineticsCore diagnoses diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos without physician input. A 2025 American Journal of Ophthalmology systematic review and meta-analysis of IDx-DR reported a pooled AUC of 0.95. A 2025 Acta Ophthalmologica study of agreement with human grading gave IDx-DR a kappa of 0.43 and Mona DR 0.68. The vendor names OSF HealthCare among its customers, so health systems with diabetes patients in primary care are its audience.

Gleamer works on X-ray, CT, MRI and mammography images, and LumineticsCore on retinal photographs, which puts radiology readers on one side and diabetes care teams on the other.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Digital Diagnostics logo

Digital Diagnostics

by Digital Diagnostics Inc.

LumineticsCore: De Novo authorized autonomous AI that detects more than mild diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos.

Gleamer logo

Gleamer

by Gleamer SAS

Radiology AI for fracture and chest X-ray findings, plus CT, MRI and mammography; part of RadNet DeepHealth since March 2026.

When to pick each one

Digital Diagnostics

  • Diagnoses diabetic retinopathy from retinal photos
  • Meta-analysis reported pooled AUC of 0.95
Read the full Digital Diagnostics review

Gleamer

  • Fracture and chest X-ray findings in one vendor
  • Vendor says worklist prioritization plugs into the RIS
  • Prospective crossover study of three commercial MSK tools
Read the full Gleamer review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Digital Diagnostics

28of 100

Niche fit

Gleamer

56of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Digital Diagnostics and Gleamer
DimensionDigital DiagnosticsGleamerDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.218.2 / 18.2-18.2
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Digital Diagnostics

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Gleamer

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecDigital DiagnosticsGleamer
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSFR

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.