Epic Sepsis Model vs Navina
Navina targets primary care and value-based groups on athenahealth, Epic or Veradigm that want chart summaries and HCC suggestions at the visit. The vendor lists Privia Health and Agilon Health among its customers, states HIPAA, SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and its homepage cites first place in the 2025 Best in KLAS Clinician Digital Workflow category. No price is public, and KLAS comments describe a per-member-per-month fee.
The unrated KLAS excerpts split. One director says support overpromises and underdelivers, another describes a topical medicine suggested for a condition that isn't (the excerpt cuts off), and others say physicians like it and risk adjustment factor scores improved.
A hospital already on Epic runs the Epic Sepsis Model for adult inpatients and ED patients, so a primary care group's chart review and a hospital's sepsis scoring serve different settings. openFDA holds no record for it. Epic's K260008 clearance covers the Deterioration Index Version 2, and Navina's homepage states no FDA status.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
Epic Sepsis Model
by Epic Systems
Sepsis risk score calculated every 15 minutes inside the Epic EHR, with alert thresholds set by each hospital.
Navina
by Navina · founded 2018
AI copilot for chart review, risk adjustment and care gaps in primary care and value-based care groups.
When to pick each one
Epic Sepsis Model
- Runs inside Epic with no separate integrations
- Sepsis scoring for admitted patients
Navina
- athenahealth, Epic and Veradigm named
- HCC suggestions and care gaps at the visit
- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 stated
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Epic Sepsis Model
41of 100
Navina
36of 100
| Dimension | Epic Sepsis Model | Navina | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | -1.7 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 3.4 / 4.8 | -3.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 21 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +21 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 9 / 9 | 0 / 9 | +9 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | -5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 | -6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Epic Sepsis Model
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Delivered within Epic licensing. |
Navina
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Epic Sepsis Model
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
5 PubMed records name Epic Sepsis Model.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Externally Validated Epic Clinical Decision Support Tools. (opens in new tab)
- Evaluation of Sepsis Prediction Models before Onset of Treatment. (opens in new tab)
- Multicenter Prospective Validation of an Updated Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model. (opens in new tab)
Navina
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Epic Sepsis Model | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | athenahealth, Epic, Veradigm |
| Founded | n/a | 2018 |
| HQ | US | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.