Evidently vs Fourier Health
Fourier Health and Evidently both read records instead of listening to visits. The vendor says Fourier ingests faxes, PDFs, scans and HL7, classifies them, and puts specialty summaries cited to source into Epic, Cerner or Athena. It sells to health systems, specialty networks and MSOs. Its figure of 83.9% fewer records reviewed per patient is the vendor's own, with no method shown. Evidently drafts admission H&Ps from chart data on Epic. The vendor whitepaper links a University of Iowa pilot whose abstract does not name Evidently: 22 matched pairs, single center, retrospective, with the AI matching the principal diagnosis in 20. A hospitalist group on Epic that wants admission notes drafted gets less from Fourier, whose listed outputs are sorted records and summaries. An oncology MSO swamped by faxed referrals starts with Fourier's intake product.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Evidently
by Evidently, Inc.
Clinical data intelligence for health systems: chart review, drafted notes and CDI and coding suggestions inside the EHR.

Fourier Health
by Fourier Health · founded 2023
AI medical record intake and cited specialty summaries for health systems, specialty networks and MSOs, delivered into the EHR.
When to pick each one
Evidently
- Vendor says it drafts admission H&Ps from the chart
- Epic named on vendor pages
- Iowa pilot linked by the vendor
Fourier Health
- Vendor says it ingests faxes, PDFs and scans
- Summaries cited to source, per the vendor
- One Oncology and TN Oncology logos
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Evidently
20of 100
Fourier Health
47of 100
| Dimension | Evidently | Fourier Health | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 13 | 13 / 13 | -13 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 6.3 / 21 | 6.3 / 21 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 4.8 / 12 | 12 / 12 | -7.2 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 3 / 6 | -3 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Evidently
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. No pricing page is published; the site offers Talk to Us and Book a live demo. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from evidently.com (opens in new tab).
Fourier Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The site is sales-led with Request a demo and no pricing page. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from fourierhealth.com (opens in new tab).
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Evidently | Fourier Health |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic | Epic, Cerner, Athena |
| Founded | n/a | 2023 |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.
