MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Gleamer vs Lunit

Breast screening is the clearest overlap. Lunit's INSIGHT MMG (K211678, November 2021, with v1.1.10 as K260320 in April 2026) and INSIGHT DBT for tomosynthesis (K231470, with updates K242652 and K253796) are on openFDA, and Lunit completed its Volpara purchase in May 2024 for about US$193M. Gleamer's page lists BreastView for mammography, and its US status is not established. A US breast screening program has Lunit's openFDA records to go on, which makes Gleamer the weaker pick for that buyer.

Lunit says its FDA-cleared and CE-marked products run at 10,000+ sites in 70+ countries, and Gleamer says 3,500+ clinical sites in 50+ countries. Both are vendor figures. Lunit takes inquiries through a contact form and Gleamer through demo requests, with no public price from either.

An emergency or orthopedic imaging service buys Gleamer for BoneView, whose two clearances (March 2022 and March 2023) are for fracture and bone-trauma detection on X-ray.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Gleamer logo

Gleamer

by Gleamer SAS

Radiology AI for fracture and chest X-ray findings, plus CT, MRI and mammography; part of RadNet DeepHealth since March 2026.

Lunit logo

Lunit

by Lunit · founded 2013

AI for chest X-ray, mammography and breast tomosynthesis, Volpara breast-density tools, and pathology biomarker software (SCOPE).

When to pick each one

Gleamer

  • BoneView fracture reads on X-ray
  • ChestView US records K241620 and K252486
  • Systematic review of BoneView fracture detection
Read the full Gleamer review

Lunit

  • INSIGHT MMG and DBT for breast screening
  • Volpara density tools since the 2024 acquisition
  • Vendor lists INSIGHT CXR TB screening and normal flagging
Read the full Lunit review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Gleamer

56of 100

Solid choice

Lunit

66of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Gleamer and Lunit
DimensionGleamerLunitDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers18.2 / 18.212.7 / 18.2+5.5
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.87.8 / 7.8-7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Gleamer

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Lunit

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Contact form only.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecGleamerLunit
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2013
HQFRKR

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.