MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

PERISCOPE vs Octagos

The Octagos buyer is the device clinic of a cardiology group. The PERISCOPE buyer is a hospital surgical quality or infection prevention team. The two buyers do not overlap: one handles implantable device transmissions, the other post-operative infection risk.

Octagos names Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent and NextGen. The vendor says Atlas AI drafts reports from cardiac implantable device transmissions, a physician e-signature completes each one, and EHR go-live averages 21 days. Pro is software only, Premium adds clinical and patient engagement services, and Flex is on-demand, all without amounts.

PERISCOPE gives a surgical team a risk category and top contributing factors for postoperative infection, and the homepage links an ROI calculator in place of a price. The vendor says it holds ISO 13485 and ISO 27001. An Octagos-linked JACC Advances paper from 2025 reports Atlas AI at 99.1% sensitivity against 70.8% for technicians, in the vendor's reading. PERISCOPE rests on one retrospective multicentre study.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

PERISCOPE logo

PERISCOPE

by Healthplus.ai

PERISCOPE predicts postoperative bacterial infection risk 7 and 30 days after surgery from EHR data.

Octagos logo

Octagos

by Octagos

Remote cardiac device monitoring where AI triages implantable device transmissions and US specialists review them, for cardiology clinics.

When to pick each one

PERISCOPE

  • Risk category and top contributing factors per patient
  • ISO 13485 and ISO 27001 stated
Read the full PERISCOPE review

Octagos

  • Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent and NextGen
  • Physician e-signature on every report, per vendor
Read the full Octagos review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

PERISCOPE

15of 100

Tracked

Octagos

43of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for PERISCOPE and Octagos
DimensionPERISCOPEOctagosDifference
FDA clearance0 / 120 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.84.8 / 4.8-4.8
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 2114.7 / 21-6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

PERISCOPE

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Octagos

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecPERISCOPEOctagos
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent, NextGen
Foundedn/an/a
HQNLUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.