Implicity vs Navina
A cardiac device clinic monitoring pacemakers, ICDs, CRT devices and insertable loop recorders from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and MicroPort is Implicity's buyer. The cloud platform scores heart failure risk from device data (SignalHF) and filters atrial fibrillation alerts. OpenFDA lists SignalHF's clearance, K230842, on October 25, 2023, while the vendor's press release gives May 17, 2024. The vendor says its ILR ECG Analyzer cuts false positives 79% on Medtronic recordings at 99% sensitivity. A 2023 Europace evaluation of its insertable-monitor algorithm, 879 abnormal episodes in 546 patients with Implicity authors, reported 98.6% sensitivity and 76.0% specificity. A funding-news page says the platform "can integrate with electronic health records," and the vendor's home page names no EHR.
Navina sells to primary care groups, such as the Privia Health and Agilon Health logos on its homepage. The homepage names athenahealth, Epic and Veradigm, and the vendor says 20,000+ clinicians and care team members use it. A device clinic watching implant alerts and a primary care group working an attributed population are not weighing these two against each other.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
Implicity
by Implicity · founded 2016
Cloud platform for remote monitoring of pacemakers and ICDs, with AI alert filtering and heart failure risk scoring for device clinics.

Navina
by Navina · founded 2018
AI copilot for chart review, risk adjustment and care gaps in primary care and value-based care groups.
When to pick each one
Implicity
- Remote monitoring of pacemakers, ICDs and loop recorders
- Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, MicroPort devices
- Three FDA 510(k) numbers on openFDA
Navina
- Privia Health and Agilon Health among customers
- Care-gap closure alongside risk adjustment
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Implicity
36of 100
Navina
36of 100
| Dimension | Implicity | Navina | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 0 / 12 | +12 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | -1.7 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 3.4 / 4.8 | -3.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +8.4 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | -5.4 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 6 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Implicity
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Navina
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Implicity
FDA decisions
K253463 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-07-02
ILR ECG Analyzer (IM007)
K230842 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-10-25
SignalHF (IM008)
K210543 (opens in new tab)510(k)2021-11-03
IM007
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Implicity.
Navina
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Implicity | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | athenahealth, Epic, Veradigm |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| HQ | FR | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
