MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Zio vs KATE

The Zio service from iRhythm has 18 FDA 510(k) decisions, the newest ZEUS Platform K252859 on May 29, 2026, and an FDA warning letter dated May 25, 2023. The company's annual report says FDA issues remain open and that a further warning letter is possible. A deep neural network reads the patch data, technicians review it, and a physician report follows. iRhythm is public, with about 2,400 employees at the end of 2025, and bills payers through Medicare-enrolled IDTFs.

KATE from Mednition recommends triage acuity for emergency nurses and flags sepsis risk from EHR data at triage. A 2019 vendor release claimed triage accuracy up 26.9% at Adventist Health White Memorial. KATE Sepsis received Breakthrough Device Designation in November 2023, which is a designation and not a clearance, and openFDA lists no K or DEN number for it. Mednition's $10M Series A dates from 2019, and its site offers an ROI calculator instead of a price.

Zio is ordered by practices and health systems for ambulatory ECG monitoring. KATE is adopted by an emergency department for triage and sepsis flagging. The two have no buyer in common.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

ZI

Zio

by iRhythm Technologies · founded 2006

Zio ECG patch service: a deep-learning algorithm flags arrhythmias, cardiac technicians validate them, and a physician report follows.

KATE logo

KATE

by Mednition · founded 2014

KATE AI recommends emergency department triage acuity and flags sepsis risk from EHR data at triage.

When to pick each one

Zio

  • Zio patch, technician review, physician report
  • 18 FDA 510(k) decisions, newest May 2026
Read the full Zio review

KATE

  • ED triage acuity and sepsis flag at triage
  • Breakthrough Device Designation for KATE Sepsis
  • Adventist Health hospitals named as customers
Read the full KATE review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Zio

69of 100

Top-ranked

KATE

12of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for Zio and KATE
DimensionZioKATEDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers21 / 210 / 21+21
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review9 / 90 / 9+9
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 123 / 12+5.4
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Zio

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

KATE

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Zio

FDA decisions

Show 13 more

Peer-reviewed

5 PubMed records name Zio.

KATE

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecZioKATE
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20062014
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.