MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Zio vs Octagos

Zio is a patch worn on the skin. A deep neural network analyzes the recording in the cloud, qualified cardiac technicians validate the preliminary findings, and a physician report follows. The publicly traded parent, iRhythm Holdings, bills payers through Medicare-enrolled IDTFs, and no public price is listed. OpenFDA lists 18 510(k) records, the latest being the ZEUS Platform, K252859, decided in May 2026. A cardiology practice ordering ambulatory ECG monitoring for suspected arrhythmias buys it.

Octagos, a Houston company founded by practicing electrophysiologist Shanti Bansal, MD, works on what implanted pacemakers and defibrillators transmit. Clinics following those devices are its customers, and a practice that also runs an ambulatory ECG program could buy both for separate workloads. Its pricing page names four tiers, Pro as software only, Premium adding clinical and patient engagement services, Flex for on-demand services and Custom. Billing options are per billable transmission, a fixed monthly fee or a custom plan. The vendor claims an average of 21 days to EHR go-live.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

ZI

Zio

by iRhythm Technologies · founded 2006

Zio ECG patch service: a deep-learning algorithm flags arrhythmias, cardiac technicians validate them, and a physician report follows.

Octagos logo

Octagos

by Octagos

Remote cardiac device monitoring where AI triages implantable device transmissions and US specialists review them, for cardiology clinics.

When to pick each one

Zio

  • Wear-and-send patch with technician review
  • 18 FDA 510(k) records on openFDA
  • Billed through Medicare-enrolled IDTFs
Read the full Zio review

Octagos

  • Pro tier is software only
  • Vendor says 21 days average to EHR go-live
  • Usage-based, fixed monthly or custom billing
Read the full Octagos review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Zio

69of 100

Top-ranked

Octagos

43of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Zio and Octagos
DimensionZioOctagosDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.84.8 / 4.8-4.8
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers21 / 2114.7 / 21+6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review9 / 90 / 9+9
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 123 / 12+5.4
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Zio

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Octagos

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Zio

FDA decisions

Show 13 more

Peer-reviewed

5 PubMed records name Zio.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecZioOctagos
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent, NextGen
Founded2006n/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.