MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Lunit vs Qure.ai

Qure.ai holds ten FDA 510(k) records to Lunit's six, and the chest X-ray entries differ. Lunit's chest X-ray record is INSIGHT CXR Triage, cleared in 2021. Qure's qXR-LN (K231805) was cleared in December 2023 for radiologists, pulmonologists and ER physicians reading adult frontal chest radiographs, and qXR-PTX-PE adds pneumothorax and effusion triage. Qure also reads head CT with qER. Lunit's other records cover 2D mammography and tomosynthesis, with Volpara tools for density, so a breast imaging center that also reads chest films buys from Lunit. A US hospital shopping for nodule detection on radiographs finds Lunit gives way to Qure. On TB, an independent PLOS Digital Health comparison found a newer INSIGHT CXR version less accurate until its threshold was recalibrated, while an independent 12-product evaluation put qXR v3 at 95.5% sensitivity with 48.7% specificity at one threshold.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Lunit logo

Lunit

by Lunit · founded 2013

AI for chest X-ray, mammography and breast tomosynthesis, Volpara breast-density tools, and pathology biomarker software (SCOPE).

Qure.ai logo

Qure.ai

by Qure.ai

AI for chest X-ray (qXR), head CT (qER) and lung nodule CT, with TB screening. The homepage cites sites across 107 countries.

When to pick each one

Lunit

  • Volpara density tools alongside mammography AI
  • INSIGHT CXR Triage, 510(k) cleared in 2021
  • Lunit says WHO recommended it for TB screening
Read the full Lunit review

Qure.ai

  • qXR-LN nodule detection on adult frontal chest radiographs
  • qXR-PTX-PE pneumothorax and effusion triage, 2023
  • 10 FDA records on openFDA across chest and CT
Read the full Qure.ai review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Lunit

66of 100

Top-ranked

Qure.ai

50of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for Lunit and Qure.ai
DimensionLunitQure.aiDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers12.7 / 18.212.7 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review7.8 / 7.80 / 7.8+7.8
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Lunit

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Contact form only.

Qure.ai

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Grant funding is not stated on Qure pages.

Evidence

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecLunitQure.ai
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2013n/a
HQKRIN

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.