MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Magentiq Eye vs Nanox.AI

Nanox lists CT as its modality and Magentiq lists live lower-GI endoscopy video, so the two sell to different departments.

Radiology departments hunting undiagnosed coronary calcium, vertebral fractures or fatty liver are who Nanox.AI is built for, since it works on scans a hospital has already taken. HealthCCSng returns an exact calcium score on non-gated CT for adults 30 to 85 under K241440 (August 19, 2024). A 2025 validation of HealthOST in Diagnostics reported 92.0% sensitivity for vertebral compression fractures at the 20% height-loss threshold, with specificity figures starting at 52.7%. The vendor says it holds 7 FDA clearances, while openFDA lists 12 AI records under the Zebra, Nanoxai and Nano-X AI names, including older lines such as HealthMammo, HealthJOINT and HealthPNX.

MAGENTIQ-COLO from the Haifa company, founded in 2014, takes the video from the endoscopy tower of a hospital GI unit or endoscopy center. The vendor says it is offered on monthly rental with low upfront cost and automatic software updates.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Magentiq Eye logo

Magentiq Eye

by MAGENTIQ EYE · founded 2014

Real-time AI polyp detection during colonoscopy, FDA 510(k) cleared as MAGENTIQ-COLO.

Nanox.AI logo

Nanox.AI

by Nano-X Imaging

CT AI for opportunistic screening: coronary calcium, vertebral fractures and liver fat on routine CT scans, for radiology departments.

When to pick each one

Magentiq Eye

  • Colonoscopy polyp detection on the live video feed
  • Vendor says monthly rental, low upfront cost
  • Vendor says automatic software updates included
Read the full Magentiq Eye review

Nanox.AI

  • Opportunistic CT screening: calcium, spine, liver
  • HealthCCSng exact calcium score, K241440
  • PACS and EMR connection stated
Read the full Nanox.AI review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Magentiq Eye

35of 100

Competitive

Nanox.AI

35of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Magentiq Eye and Nanox.AI
DimensionMagentiq EyeNanox.AIDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Magentiq Eye

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Monthly rental stated.

Nanox.AI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Magentiq Eye

FDA decisions

Nanox.AI

FDA decisions

Show 7 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecMagentiq EyeNanox.AI
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded2014n/a
HQILn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.