MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Matic vs Telepatia

Telepatia's buyer is a clinic or hospital group on Tasy, MV, Dinámica Gerencial or Hosvital. Free account sign-up exists during a launch period with no stated end date, and a USD 99 monthly list price sits beside the USD 0 launch price. Telepatia says its audit module checks every note, where human auditors reach about 3 percent. Press dated June 18, 2026 reports a US$33M Series A led by Andreessen Horowitz, after a US$9M seed in October 2025.

Matic sells to physicians and practices, with Catalyst Health Group as its named customer. It names Wellmed and Agilon as payer data partners, claims 99 percent accurate notes, and names no EHR.

The two do not share a market. Matic's base is Dallas, Texas, while Telepatia's address is Medellín, Colombia, so nobody weighs them side by side.

AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Matic logo

Matic

by Matic, Inc.

Clinical AI platform for physicians and practices: ambient documentation (Scribematic), medical coding and evidence search.

Telepatia logo

Telepatia

by Telepatía S.A.S.

Medical AI for Latin American physicians that transcribes consultations, drafts notes and flags drug interactions for review.

When to pick each one

Matic

  • Customer example is Catalyst Health Group
  • Names Wellmed and Agilon as payer data partners
  • Vendor claims 99% accurate notes
Read the full Matic review

Telepatia

  • Free account sign-up during a launch period
  • Names Tasy, MV, Dinámica Gerencial and Hosvital
  • Vendor says its audit module checks every note
Read the full Telepatia review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Matic

22of 100

Niche fit

Telepatia

31of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Matic and Telepatia
DimensionMaticTelepatiaDifference
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA13 / 137.8 / 13+5.2
EHR integrations (count)0 / 2110.5 / 21-10.5
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 120 / 120
Bidirectional write-back0 / 5.20 / 5.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 70 / 70
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 30 / 30
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 55 / 5-2.5
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Matic

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The site offers a demo request and "Talk to an Expert" only.

Telepatia

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Individual$99n/aList price USD 99 per month. The institutions page shows a USD 0 launch price next to it, a free launch period with no end date stated. Institutional is quoted by team size and is not listed as a priced tier. Trial and refund terms not stated

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecMaticTelepatia
Free tierNo / unverifiedYes
HIPAAYesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedTasy, MV, Dinámica Gerencial, Hosvital
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSCO

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Open the full ai medical scribes comparison

The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.