Nabla vs Scribble

IKS Health sells Scribble in four tiers. Now is fully automated with notes in minutes, Swift adds a human scribe for about an hour, Pro has a clinician scribe review and post to the EHR in about four hours with E&M coding included, and Select lets the clinician pick a tier per encounter. The vendor lists access through Epic Connection Hub. Nabla says it generates ambient notes, builds dictation into Epic and suggests E/M and ICD-10 codes, and its terms of sale set a monthly per-user fee in euros excluding VAT. Nabla's evidence is a three-arm NEJM AI trial of 238 physicians at one California academic system, in which the Nabla arm cut time in note by 9.5% against usual care. Scribble cites a client story of its own, without methods, of 9.34% more RVUs and $106k (currency not stated) net per physician yearly. A health system that buys on trial evidence picks Nabla. A multi-specialty group on Epic that wants a clinician scribe to review and post each note, with E&M coding included, suits Scribble Pro.