MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

SimpleSense vs PaceMate

PaceMate says Auto-Triage sorts a cardiac device clinic's alert queue by clinical priority and Auto-Script drafts a preliminary report. The vendor lists bi-directional links to Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth. PaceMate's homepage, platform, security and pricing pages state nothing on FDA status, and openFDA lists no PaceMate applicant. The one device-name hit is a 1990 Elecath catheter.

Nanowear sells a cloth sensor garment with cloud analytics for heart failure monitoring and cuffless blood pressure, and openFDA lists four Nanowear 510(k)s from K161431 in 2016 to SimpleSense-BP K232053 in December 2023. The scope of K212160 for heart failure alerts is not documented. Nanowear's site shows no public price and names no customers. A heart failure or hypertension program is Nanowear's buyer. A device clinic managing implants and loop recorders is PaceMate's.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

SimpleSense logo

SimpleSense

by Nanowear · founded 2014

Cloth wearable with 510(k) cleared AI cloud analytics for remote cardiac monitoring and cuffless blood pressure.

PaceMate logo

PaceMate

by PaceMate

Cardiac device remote monitoring platform whose Auto-Triage ranks device alerts by clinical priority for device clinics.

When to pick each one

SimpleSense

  • Four FDA 510(k) clearances, 2016 to 2023
  • Cloth garment the vendor sells for home heart failure monitoring
  • Cuffless blood pressure through SimpleSense-BP
Read the full SimpleSense review

PaceMate

  • Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, bi-directional per the vendor
  • Device clinic alert triage and preliminary reports
Read the full PaceMate review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

SimpleSense

49of 100

Solid choice

PaceMate

47of 100

Solid choice
Score by dimension for SimpleSense and PaceMate
DimensionSimpleSensePaceMateDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.61.7 / 5.6-1.7
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.84.8 / 4.8-4.8
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 2114.7 / 210
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review4.5 / 94.5 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

SimpleSense

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

PaceMate

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecSimpleSensePaceMate
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, Oracle Health, athenahealth
Founded2014n/a
HQUSn/a

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.