MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Philips Imaging AI vs Tempus AI Imaging

A hospital cardiology service choosing its next cardiac imaging AI faces two different modalities. Tempus describes Pixel, the cloud platform formerly called Arterys, as cardiac MR analysis that can generate T1 and T2 inline maps from raw MRI data, and Pixel received a special 510(k) update in September 2025. For a service built around cardiac MR, Philips gives way to Tempus. Philips covers echo and CT instead: DiA LVivo automated cardiac measurements cleared in 2025, TomTec-ARENA, EchoNavigator, QLAB and AV Cardiac CT. An echo-led service starts with Philips.

Tempus also describes lesion segmentation and RECIST-style response reports for oncology services, and claims use at 100+ health systems. Pixel's Lung module is FDA cleared under K203744 without an indication for nodule detection, which a third-party engine supplies in the U.S.

Radiology · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Philips AI-enabled imaging portfolio across MR, CT, ultrasound and cardiology, including DiA and TomTec. 49 Philips entries on the FDA AI-device list plus 12 from DiA and TomTec.

Tempus AI Imaging logo

Tempus AI Imaging

by Tempus AI

Tempus Pixel (formerly Arterys): cloud imaging AI for radiology and oncology reads, with cardiac MR, lung, breast and prostate tools.

When to pick each one

Philips Imaging AI

  • Echo measurements via DiA LVivo, cleared 2025
  • TomTec-ARENA, EchoNavigator and QLAB cardiac tools
  • AV Cardiac CT and AV Vascular workstation software
Read the full Philips Imaging AI review

Tempus AI Imaging

  • Cardiac MR analysis with inline T1 and T2 maps
  • Lesion segmentation and RECIST-style oncology reports
  • Integrates with PACS, worklist and dictation, per Tempus
Read the full Tempus AI Imaging review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Philips Imaging AI

39of 100

Competitive

Tempus AI Imaging

32of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Philips Imaging AI and Tempus AI Imaging
DimensionPhilips Imaging AITempus AI ImagingDifference
FDA clearance18 / 1818 / 180
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 4.20 / 4.20
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 2.40 / 2.40
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 18.20 / 18.20
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 7.80 / 7.80
Funding & adoption signal12 / 126 / 12+6
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Philips Imaging AI

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprise and OEMn/an/aNo public price. Sold with scanners and ultrasound systems on enterprise and OEM contracts.

Tempus AI Imaging

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Philips Imaging AI

FDA decisions

Show 9 more

Tempus AI Imaging

FDA decisions

Show 3 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecPhilips Imaging AITempus AI Imaging
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQNLUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full radiology comparison

Acute-care triage, mammography screening, CCTA plaque analysis, mobile MRI. 30+ FDA-cleared platforms across stroke, oncology, cardiac. Enterprise sales only — we compared what's deployed where.