MedAI Verdict
Radiology

AI Radiology

Artrya logo

Artrya

by Artrya Limited  ·  AU

Last verified

Salix AI plaque analysis of coronary CT angiography for chest pain patients, as an adjunct to clinician review.

At a glance

Pricing
No public price.
HIPAA
Not disclosed
SOC 2
Not disclosed
EHRs
—
Founded
—
HQ
AU
On this page

Independent score  ·  By our public rubric

28/100Niche fit

Not rated: too little independent evidence yet.

How it’s computed →
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    18/28

    FDA cleared (2 K-numbers on record)

  • Clinical Integration
    0/6.6

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Evidence Strength
    0/26

    No peer-reviewed coverage

  • Vendor & Market
    3/18

    Seed-stage or unfunded

  • Sentiment & Transparency
    2.5/5

    Pricing on request, no public amounts

▸ Show all 11 dimensions

Regulatory & Compliance

  • FDA clearance18/18

    FDA cleared (2 K-numbers on record)

  • HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10

    No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation

Clinical Integration

  • EHR integrations (count)0/4

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0/2

    None of the top-3 EHRs covered

Evidence Strength

  • Peer-reviewed papers0/18

    No peer-reviewed coverage

  • RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0/8

    No RCT, meta-analysis, or systematic review

Vendor & Market

  • Funding & adoption signal3/12

    Seed-stage or unfunded

  • Years in market0/6

    Founded year not recorded

Sentiment & Transparency

  • Pricing transparency3/5

    Pricing on request, no public amounts

Scored November 2, 2026 · Public scoring method v1.2.0

Salix AI plaque analysis of coronary CT angiography for chest pain patients, as an adjunct to clinician review.

No public price.

Bottom line

Artrya Limited, an ASX-listed company with its registered office in West Perth, Australia, sells Salix, a web-based tool for analyzing coronary CT angiograms. FDA's records hold two 510(k) clearances, both from 2025, and the indication describes Salix as an adjunct to a clinician's own review. It fits a cardiac CT service that wants plaque volume and composition reported with stenosis and calcium score. The vendor's evidence on its site is epidemiology only, and for Europe and the UK the site says to contact the company.

What does Artrya say Salix does?

According to the vendor, Artrya partners with clinics that receive chest pain patients, and its AI shows the type and volume of arterial plaque from CCTA so patients can be stratified "within minutes". The vendor describes detection of the location and extent of atherosclerosis and plaque features such as low attenuation plaque, a personalized 3D heart model, and standardized reports with plaque volume and composition aligned to SCCT guidelines. It adds that two convolutional neural network models extract centerlines, trained on "thousands of scans" from the US, Australia and Canada.

Which Salix modules are cleared, and where?

The site names Salix Coronary Anatomy, Salix Central and Salix Coronary Plaque. FDA lists Salix Central as K243038, cleared March 27, 2025, and Salix Coronary Plaque (V1.0.0) as K251837, cleared August 20, 2025. Salix Coronary Anatomy is on the Australian register as ARTG 347719.

The vendor's indications page defines Salix as software for trained medical professionals who analyze cardiac CT data for coronary plaque and stenosis and for calcium scoring in patients who had CCTA to evaluate coronary artery disease, and it states that Salix is an adjunct and does not replace a health professional's own review.

What evidence does the vendor give?

Two epidemiology citations carry the rationale on the site. Williams 2020 is quoted for 42% of heart attack victims having less than 50% stenosis, and Villines and Williams 2022 for 18% of patients with a zero calcium score having problematic, highly progressive low attenuation plaque. Neither citation tests Salix. A PubMed search on Artrya and the Salix module names returned no papers about the product.

Who sells Salix, and how?

Salix is sold through a "Request A Demo" page on the vendor's site, and no price is listed there. Founding year and funding are not verified.

The verdict

Salix suits a cardiac CT service that already runs CCTA and is prepared to rely on the FDA clearances and the vendor's own descriptions, since the evidence on the vendor's site is epidemiology. A service buying in Europe or the UK has only a contact route, because the site gives no CE or UKCA status.

Editorial review last generated November 2, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.

What it costs

All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
EnterpriseNot statedNot statedNo public price.

Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked November 2, 2026.

What deploys cleanly

Carries FDA 510(k) per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment.