MedAI Verdict
Radiology

AI Radiology

Elucid

by Elucid Bioimaging

Last verified

PlaqueIQ analyzes coronary plaque on CT angiograms, with FDA 510(k) clearances in September 2024 and September 2026.

At a glance

Pricing
No public price. Providers are billed per analysis. Category I CPT code 75577 has applied since 1 January 2026.
HIPAA
Not disclosed
SOC 2
Not disclosed
EHRs
—
Founded
—
On this page

Independent score  ·  By our public rubric

32/100Competitive
How it’s computed →
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    18/28

    FDA cleared (2 K-numbers on record)

  • Clinical Integration
    0/26

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Evidence Strength
    12.7/26

    2 peer-reviewed papers

  • Vendor & Market
    3/18

    Seed-stage or unfunded

  • Sentiment & Transparency
    2.5/14

    Pricing on request, no public amounts

▸ Show all 11 dimensions

Regulatory & Compliance

  • FDA clearance18/18

    FDA cleared (2 K-numbers on record)

  • HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10

    No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation

Clinical Integration

  • EHR integrations (count)0/14

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0/8

    None of the top-3 EHRs covered

  • Bidirectional write-back0/4

    No bidirectional write-back documented

Evidence Strength

  • Peer-reviewed papers13/18

    2 peer-reviewed papers

  • RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0/8

    No RCT, meta-analysis, or systematic review

Vendor & Market

  • Funding & adoption signal3/12

    Seed-stage or unfunded

  • Years in market0/6

    Founded year not recorded

Sentiment & Transparency

  • Clinician sentiment (Reddit)0/9

    No clinician sentiment data available

  • Pricing transparency3/5

    Pricing on request, no public amounts

Scored October 15, 2026 · Public scoring method v1.1.0

Bottom line

PlaqueIQ analyzes coronary plaque on CT angiograms, with FDA 510(k) clearances in September 2024 and September 2026.

No public price. Providers are billed per analysis. Category I CPT code 75577 has applied since 1 January 2026.

Editorial review  ·  By MedAI Verdict

Bottom line

Elucid PlaqueIQ analyses coronary CT angiography images to quantify and classify plaque, including non-calcified plaque and lipid-rich necrotic core. It is FDA cleared and has had its own Medicare payment code since January 2026. It suits a cardiology or imaging practice that already runs CCTA and wants a reimbursable plaque report. Elucid is a poor match for a practice that needs instant on-scanner output, because the workflow includes trained human analysts and no turnaround time is published.

What is Elucid and who sells it?

Elucid Bioimaging, Inc. is a Boston company focused on coronary atherosclerosis. In September 2026 it announced an oversubscribed US$55M Series D, with a new, unnamed public medtech strategic investor plus IAG Capital Partners and Elevage Medical Technologies (MassDevice and Radiology Business). Lifetime funding is about US$185M according to the same coverage.

How does PlaqueIQ work?

A physician sends CCTA images to Elucid. Image restoration reduces motion and calcium blooming, trained analysts segment a 3D model of the coronary arteries, and the software identifies and quantifies the tissue (company release, October 2024). Because analysts are part of the workflow, results do not arrive instantly. Elucid says the output was validated against histology, which is the vendor's claim.

Two additions followed. A Lesion Inspection Tool for coronary and carotid plaque became commercially available in April 2026. MassDevice describes non-invasive FFR-CT analysis as pending FDA review, so it is not cleared.

What are its regulatory and payment status?

The FDA cleared PlaqueIQ as K241524 on 12 September 2024 (product code LLZ, 21 CFR 892.2050). A second PlaqueIQ 510(k), K261855, has a decision date of 18 September 2026. The cleared claim is plaque quantification to support clinicians, and the FDA record does not extend it to diagnosis of disease.

Category I CPT code 75577 for quantitative coronary plaque analysis took effect on 1 January 2026. The national average Medicare payment is about $1,012 in imaging centers and physician offices and $951 under OPPS (DAIC and a company release).

Elucid lists no EHR or PACS integration and no HIPAA, SOC 2 or HITRUST attestation.

What does the evidence say?

No published study evaluates PlaqueIQ, and trade coverage comes from the vendor. Two on-topic papers cover quantitative CCTA plaque analysis: a 2024 Current Problems in Cardiology study of intra- and inter-reader reproducibility (PMID 38688396) and a 2023 Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine paper on plaque morphology biomarkers from the EVAPORATE trial (PMID 37600044). Neither can be tied to Elucid software, so neither counts as evidence for PlaqueIQ. The other three papers tagged to Elucid, on epilepsy and dementia and on cell-free DNA in lung cancer, are unrelated.

How much does Elucid cost?

Elucid bills providers per analysis and gives no list price (as of October 2026). The Medicare payment above is what the performing site receives, which sets the revenue side of the economics. The fee Elucid charges against it is unknown.

How does it compare?

HeartFlow Plaque Analysis and Cleerly are the closest competitors and share the same CPT category. Caristo's CaRi-Heart and plaque tools from Canon and Siemens also appear in comparisons. No head-to-head data settles which is best on accuracy or turnaround.

The verdict

Elucid makes sense for a practice that will bill CPT 75577 regularly and can wait for an analyst-assisted report. A practice with low CCTA volume, or one that needs same-day plaque numbers, should pass. Get the turnaround time and the per-scan fee in writing first, since those two numbers decide whether the economics work.

Editorial review last generated October 15, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.

Pricing

What it costs

All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Per analysis——No public price. Providers are billed per analysis. Category I CPT code 75577 has applied since 1 January 2026.

Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked October 15, 2026.

Compliance + integration

What deploys cleanly

Carries FDA 510(k) per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment.

Peer-reviewed coverage

What the literature says

2 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed evaluate Elucid in clinical contexts. The most relevant are shown below, ranked by editorial relevance score combining title match, study design, recency, and journal tier.

Intra- and inter-reader reproducibility in quantitative coronary plaque analysis on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Quintana RA, von Knebel Doeberitz P, Vatsa N, et al.· Curr Probl Cardiol· 2024
Coronary artery plaque burden, low attenuation non-calcified plaque (LAP), and pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), have been linked to future cardiac events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra- and inter reader reproducibility in the quantification of coronary plaque burden and its characteristics using an artificial intelligence-enhanced semi-automated software. A total of 10 women and 6 men, aged 52 (IQR 49-58) underwent CCTA using a Siemens Somatom Force, Somatom Definition AS and Somatom Definition Flash scanners. Two expert readers utilized…
Quantitative imaging biomarkers of coronary plaque morphology: insights from EVAPORATE.
Buckler AJ, Doros G, Kinninger A, et al.· Front Cardiovasc Med· 2023
Residual cardiovascular risk persists despite statin therapy. In REDUCE-IT, icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduced total events, but the mechanisms of benefit are not fully understood. EVAPORATE evaluated the effects of IPE on plaque characteristics by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Given the conclusion that the IPE-treated patients demonstrate that plaque burden decreases has already been published in the primary study analysis, we aimed to demonstrate whether the use of an analytic technique defined and validated in histological terms could extend the primary study in terms of whet…

See all on PubMed