- No public price. Platform fee plus per-study pricing stated.
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
- —
- —


GuideAI Health
by GuideAI Health Corp.
FDA-cleared CT angiography triage that flags possible total arterial occlusion from aorta to popliteal artery.
On this page
Not rated: too little independent evidence yet.
- Regulatory & Compliance18/28
FDA cleared (1 K-number on record)
- Clinical Integration0/6.6
No EHR integrations listed
- Evidence Strength0/26
No peer-reviewed coverage
- Vendor & Market3/18
Seed-stage or unfunded
- Sentiment & Transparency2.5/5
Pricing on request, no public amounts
▸ Show all 11 dimensions▾ Hide dimension detail
- FDA clearance18/18
FDA cleared (1 K-number on record)
- HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10
No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation
- EHR integrations (count)0/4
No EHR integrations listed
- Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0/2
None of the top-3 EHRs covered
- Peer-reviewed papers0/18
No peer-reviewed coverage
- RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0/8
No RCT, meta-analysis, or systematic review
- Funding & adoption signal3/12
Seed-stage or unfunded
- Years in market0/6
Founded year not recorded
- Pricing transparency3/5
Pricing on request, no public amounts
FDA-cleared CT angiography triage that flags possible total arterial occlusion from aorta to popliteal artery.
No public price. Platform fee plus per-study pricing stated.
Evidence record
510(k)K260729 (opens in new tab)June 18, 2026
Vascular Assist Occlusion Triage (VAOT) (v1.0)
- Score computed November 2, 2026, method 1.2.0
- Review written November 2, 2026
MedAI Verdict, GuideAI Health record, https://medaiverdict.com/tools/guideai-health, version November 2, 2026
Bottom line
VascularAssist Occlusion Triage (VAOT) from GuideAI Health is the company's only FDA clearance, K260729 from June 2026. It flags possible total arterial occlusion on CT angiography studies of adults between the aorta and the popliteal artery and moves those studies up the worklist. The clearance states that it is not for primary diagnosis, screening or patient management. A radiology group that wants suspected lower body occlusions surfaced early on CTA fits the cleared use. A buyer who wants plaque quantification or carotid and coronary modules is looking at products the vendor lists as investigational.
What are the scope and limits?
The 510(k) text covers "the analysis of CTA studies of adult patients" for workflow prioritization of studies with imaging patterns consistent with possible total arterial occlusion in the aorta, common iliac, external iliac, common femoral, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. It also says the software "does not detect, localize, characterize, measure, or diagnose vascular disease". FDA used Aidoc's BriefCase LVO Triage (K220709, head CTA) as the primary predicate, and the difference is the lower extremity territory.
GuideAI's website talks about finding peripheral artery disease in imaging taken for other reasons. Plaque quantification, longitudinal monitoring, carotid and coronary modules, a workflow platform in pilot design and Executive Health arterial characterization are described as investigational. A Gateway component acts as a PACS listener, receives a copy of the CTA DICOM study and alerts the PACS or RIS workstation, and the vendor says it adds no new viewer or parallel queue.
What did the sponsor's test measure?
The 510(k) summary reports a standalone premarket validation that the sponsor ran. Sensitivity was 0.915 (95% CI 0.862 to 0.953) and specificity 0.901 (0.842 to 0.944), against a primary endpoint goal of 80%, and the secondary endpoint of notification in under 5 minutes was met. The website claims above 90% sensitivity at patient level. The study data is the sponsor's premarket test, and PubMed lists no paper on the product.
Who backs it and how is it sold?
Two interventional radiologists founded the company, Dr. Raj Shah as CEO and Dr. Luke Higgins as CMO and COO. The vendor describes a model development agreement with vRad, with access to imaging from more than 2,100 hospitals. After a business combination in June 2026 the shares trade on Cboe Canada as GDAI. FDA lists the applicant in Boston, Massachusetts, and the website states no headquarters.
For hospitals and practices the home page describes a platform fee plus a per study component, and amounts are not published.
The verdict
VAOT fits an imaging service with steady lower body CTA volume that wants a worklist flag for possible total occlusion. It does not fit a buyer who needs a diagnostic read or broader peripheral artery disease detection. The 0.915 sensitivity comes from the vendor's own premarket test.
Editorial review last generated November 2, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.
What it costs
All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Not stated | Not stated | No public price. Platform fee plus per-study pricing stated. |
Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked November 2, 2026.
What deploys cleanly
Carries FDA 510(k) per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment.



