- No public price. Demo or contact only.
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
- —
- —
- US


Sepsis ImmunoScore
by Prenosis · US
AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.
On this page
Editorial rating 2.5 / 5
- Regulatory & Compliance12/22
FDA cleared (1 K-number on record)
- Clinical Integration0/11.6
No EHR integrations listed
- Evidence Strength14.7/30
2 peer-reviewed papers
- Vendor & Market3/18
Seed-stage or unfunded
- Sentiment & Transparency1.3/2.5
Pricing on request, no public amounts
▸ Show all 11 dimensions▾ Hide dimension detail
- FDA clearance12/12
FDA cleared (1 K-number on record)
- HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10
No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation
- EHR integrations (count)0/6
No EHR integrations listed
- Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0/5
None of the top-3 EHRs covered
- Bidirectional write-back0/1
No bidirectional write-back documented
- Peer-reviewed papers15/21
2 peer-reviewed papers
- RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0/9
No RCT, meta-analysis, or systematic review
- Funding & adoption signal3/12
Seed-stage or unfunded
- Years in market0/6
Founded year not recorded
- Pricing transparency1/3
Pricing on request, no public amounts
AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.
No public price. Demo or contact only.
Evidence record
De NovoDEN230036 (opens in new tab)April 2, 2024
Sepsis ImmunoScore
2 studies on PubMed: 2 other, published 2024 to 2026. Read the literature summary
- Score computed November 2, 2026, method 1.2.0
- Review written November 2, 2026
MedAI Verdict, Sepsis ImmunoScore record, https://medaiverdict.com/tools/prenosis, version November 2, 2026
Bottom line
Sepsis ImmunoScore was authorized by the FDA through De Novo (DEN230036, decided on April 2, 2024), a different route from a 510(k) clearance. It turns up to 22 EHR parameters into one of four risk bands for adults admitted to the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis. The vendor says it has not been validated in ICU or labor and delivery units and that it is for the US only, so hospitals whose sepsis patients are mostly in intensive care, and hospitals outside the US, should look elsewhere. The published studies are Prenosis-authored or vendor-listed.
What exactly did the FDA authorize?
The record reads DEN230036, "Sepsis ImmunoScore", requester Prenosis, Inc. of Chicago, IL, product code SAK, under 21 CFR 880.6316, a "software device to aid in the prediction or diagnosis of sepsis". No K number appears for the company. "The first-ever FDA-authorized AI diagnostic for sepsis" is the vendor's wording.
How does the score work?
The vendor says the model takes up to 22 parameters from the EHR, including age, vital signs and labs such as procalcitonin, CRP and lactate, and returns a low, medium, high or very high band for deterioration risk within 24 hours. The intended population is adults 18 and over admitted to the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis, meaning a blood culture has been ordered.
The vendor says the score is meant "not as a replacement of clinical judgment" and that it "has not been validated for use in certain inpatient settings such as ICU or Labor and Delivery units". The model is locked, with no continuous learning, and the vendor describes drift monitoring after go-live. The score appears in a "Sepsis Patient View" inside the EHR, and no EHR vendor is named.
What have the papers shown, and who wrote them?
A 2024 NEJM AI article, "FDA-Authorized AI/ML Tool for Sepsis Prediction: Development and Validation" (PMID 42932768), carries Prenosis authors according to the vendor's page. Two 2026 papers are on the vendor's list: one in Diagnostics titled "The Sepsis ImmunoScore Predicts Sepsis, Mortality, and Deterioration Better than Clinical Scores and Widely Available Biomarkers" (PMID 42449744), and one in JAMIA Open on SHAP-based interpretability (PMID 41767180). Two further 2026 papers (PMID 41680670 and PMID 42459343) are reviews of AI for sepsis that mention the tool without studying it.
The vendor lists an OBSERVE-ARDS study at Carle Health, where the homepage also announces a deployment.
How is it paid for?
Prenosis lists no price and offers demo or contact routes only. The vendor says sepsis falls under a DRG with no separate payment, and that a new ICD-10-PCS code for AI sepsis diagnostic tools took effect on October 1, 2025.
Who is Prenosis?
Bobby Reddy Jr., PhD, is co-founder and CEO. Meghann Howland is chief clinical officer. The company also runs a biobank, which it puts at more than 140,000 longitudinal biospecimens from over 35,000 patients, along with trials and a therapeutics pipeline. An Investors page is linked, and no round, amount or date is stated. Its product pages list no privacy or security certificate.
The verdict
Sepsis ImmunoScore fits an ED or inpatient service that wants an authorized score beside clinical judgment. Because the intended use starts at a blood culture order, the score applies after a clinician already suspects sepsis. The De Novo covers a software device to aid in the prediction or diagnosis of sepsis under 21 CFR 880.6316. The vendor separately limits intended use to adults 18 and over with suspected sepsis and a blood culture order, and says the score has not been validated in ICU or labor and delivery.
Editorial review last generated November 2, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.
What it costs
All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Not stated | Not stated | No public price. Demo or contact only. |
Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked November 2, 2026.
What deploys cleanly
Carries FDA De Novo per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment.
What the literature says
2 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed evaluate Sepsis ImmunoScore in clinical contexts. The most relevant are shown below, ranked by editorial relevance score combining title match, study design, recency, and journal tier.
- The Sepsis ImmunoScore Predicts Sepsis, Mortality, and Deterioration Better than Clinical Scores and Widely Available Biomarkers. (opens in new tab)
- Watson GL, Updike LC, López-Espina CG, et al.· Diagnostics (Basel)· 2026
- Early and accurate risk stratification of patients suspected of serious infection is essential for improving outcomes, but existing diagnostic and predictive tools have limited accuracy. The objective was to compare the performance of an FDA-authorized AI diagnostic test, the Sepsis ImmunoScore, against widely available biomarkers and clinical tools for diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.This multicenter observational study included 6027 adult patients suspected of infection across 7 U.S. hospital sites. The Sepsis ImmunoScore's…
- FDA-Authorized AI/ML Tool for Sepsis Prediction: Development and Validation. (opens in new tab)
- Bhargava A, López-Espina C, Schmalz L, et al.· NEJM AI· 2024
- Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that demands prompt treatment for improved patient outcomes. Its heterogenous presentation makes early detection challenging, highlighting the need for effective risk assessment tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) models could potentially identify patients with sepsis, but none have previously been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for commercial use. This study outlines the development and validation of the Sepsis ImmunoScore, the first FDA-authorized AI-based software designed to identify patients at risk of sepsis. In this pros…

