- No public price.
- Not disclosed
- Not disclosed
- 1
- —


Regard
by Regard
AI platform that reviews the full EHR chart, suggests supported diagnoses with evidence, and drafts clinical notes for physician approval.
On this page
Not rated: too little independent evidence yet.
- Regulatory & Compliance0/22
No FDA clearance listed
- Clinical Integration3.6/11.6
epic only (1 of 3 top EHRs)
- Evidence Strength0/30
No peer-reviewed coverage
- Vendor & Market3/18
Seed-stage or unfunded
- Sentiment & Transparency1.3/2.5
Pricing on request, no public amounts
▸ Show all 11 dimensions▾ Hide dimension detail
- FDA clearance0/12
No FDA clearance listed
- HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10
No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation
- EHR integrations (count)2/6
1 EHR integrations
- Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)2/5
epic only (1 of 3 top EHRs)
- Bidirectional write-back0/1
No bidirectional write-back documented
- Peer-reviewed papers0/21
No peer-reviewed coverage
- RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0/9
No RCT, meta-analysis, or systematic review
- Funding & adoption signal3/12
Seed-stage or unfunded
- Years in market0/6
Founded year not recorded
- Pricing transparency1/3
Pricing on request, no public amounts
AI platform that reviews the full EHR chart, suggests supported diagnoses with evidence, and drafts clinical notes for physician approval.
No public price. integrates with Epic.
Evidence record
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
- Score computed November 2, 2026, method 1.2.0
- Review written November 2, 2026
MedAI Verdict, Regard record, https://medaiverdict.com/tools/regard, version November 2, 2026
Bottom line
The vendor says Regard reads 100% of the chart, recommends diagnoses with the evidence behind each, and drafts documentation for physician approval. The vendor's solution pages include HCC capture and mid-revenue-cycle work alongside clinical notes. Epic is the only EHR it shows. The results the vendor publishes are revenue and denial figures, so a buyer after clinical accuracy numbers should look elsewhere.
How does it work in the chart?
Regard's homepage says physicians see 3% of the data in a chart. The technology page describes four layers: EHR data ingestion mapped onto clinical concepts, diagnostic intelligence the vendor calls "proprietary, clinically validated algorithms", care and administrative workflows, and impact analytics.
According to the vendor, every condition comes with a complete evidence chain, identical charts give identical assessments, and no diagnostic logic reaches patients without physician approval. Audit logging of every assessment, data fetch and version change is claimed. The model providers behind it are not named. Solution pages cover clinical notes, mid-revenue cycle, HCC capture and screening.
On EHRs, the technology page says Regard works regardless of which EHR a hospital runs and shows only Epic over FHIR R4 in a demo animation. Oracle Health and MEDITECH are not mentioned.
What results does the vendor report?
Sentara Health shows a 17% increase in CC and MCC capture and a 4x return per user. An Arizona system is credited with more than $50 million in revenue and a North Carolina system with $9.3 million in denials prevented. The vendor's counter reads 12,993,284 recommended diagnoses accepted by clinicians, and it cites a Black Book ranking of Regard as the top clinical AI platform.
Dr. Rollin Reeder of Sentara is quoted on the homepage: "It shrinks my blindspot, finding things I would otherwise miss." The quotes there are testimonials the vendor selected. A PubMed search on the name with AI and EHR terms returned a single unrelated paper, a 2021 Spine Journal article on SMART on FHIR (PMID 32599144).
Who is behind it, and what does it hold?
The footer reads "© 2026 Regard", with no legal entity, headquarters or founding year. Eli Ben-Joseph is co-founder and CEO and Nate Wilson co-founder and president. Justin Davis is CTO, Dr. David Kirk is CMO and Francisco Alvarez, MD, is CMIO. Oak HC/FT, Cedars-Sinai Health Ventures, Calibrate Ventures, Foundry, TenOneTen and Susa Ventures are named as investors, with no amounts or dates. Customers shown include Eisenhower Health, Banner Health, Penn Highlands, UAMS Health, Main Line Health, WakeMed and Kettering Health.
"Regard SaaS Solution v.1" is certified under the ONC 2015 Cures Update criteria B10, D1, D5, D12, D13, G5 and G4, certification ID 15.04.04.3192.Rega.01.00.0.240502, dated May 2, 2024. HIPAA, SOC 2, HITRUST and BAA terms are not stated. On openFDA the name Regard returns no 510(k) record, and the technology page makes no FDA statement.
The site lists no public price. It offers a demo request and an interactive demo.
The verdict
Epic hospitals pursuing HCC capture and denial prevention match the use cases behind the Sentara result and the vendor's other case studies. The demo animation shows only Epic, and the results the vendor lists are revenue and denial figures.
Editorial review last generated November 2, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.
What it costs
All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | Not stated | Not stated | No public price. |
Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked November 2, 2026.
What deploys cleanly
Carries ONC Health IT per vendor documentation. Independent attestation review is the buyer's responsibility before clinical deployment. Integrates with Epic.

