MedAI Verdict
Decision support

Clinical Decision Support

VisualDx

by VisualDx  ·  founded 1999  ·  US

Last verified

Differential diagnosis builder with 50,000+ clinical images across skin tones and body sites.

At a glance

Pricing
Shown as $39.99 or $20.83 per month, billed annually. Free trial length is not stated. Annual plans that auto-renew have a 30-day grace period for a full refund of the renewed fee.
HIPAA
Not disclosed
SOC 2
Not disclosed
EHRs
—
Founded
1999
HQ
US
On this page

Independent score  ·  By our public rubric

36/100Competitive
How it’s computed →
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    0/28

    No FDA clearance listed

  • Clinical Integration
    0/26

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Evidence Strength
    23.7/30

    4 peer-reviewed papers

  • Vendor & Market
    14.4/18

    Mid-tier funding and adoption

  • Sentiment & Transparency
    2.5/11.5

    Prices listed publicly

▸ Show all 11 dimensions

Regulatory & Compliance

  • FDA clearance0/18

    No FDA clearance listed

  • HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0/10

    No public HIPAA/SOC2/BAA attestation

Clinical Integration

  • EHR integrations (count)0/14

    No EHR integrations listed

  • Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0/8

    None of the top-3 EHRs covered

  • Bidirectional write-back0/4

    No bidirectional write-back documented

Evidence Strength

  • Peer-reviewed papers15/21

    4 peer-reviewed papers

  • RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review9/9

    1 RCT/Meta-Analysis/Systematic Review

Vendor & Market

  • Funding & adoption signal8/12

    Mid-tier funding and adoption

  • Years in market6/6

    Founded 1999 (27 years)

Sentiment & Transparency

  • Clinician sentiment (Reddit)0/9

    No clinician sentiment data available

  • Pricing transparency3/3

    Prices listed publicly

Scored October 15, 2026 · Public scoring method v1.1.0

Bottom line  ·  Best image-based DDx

Image-DDx with 32,000+ peer-reviewed images, strongest in dermatology.

Heavy ED + primary care use for rash/lesion identification. ~$399/year individual or institutional.

Editorial review  ·  By MedAI Verdict

Bottom line

VisualDx is a differential diagnosis builder wrapped around a large library of images that the company describes as clinician-validated. Individual clinicians pay $299.99 a year for the Elite plan. It suits a primary care physician, a PA or a resident who sees rashes and wants to compare a patient's skin with images matched by skin tone and body site. VisualDx claims no FDA clearance, and a physician who mostly needs drug or guideline lookups will get more from a different reference.

What is VisualDx and who sells it?

VisualDx is based in Rochester, New York, and was founded in 1999 by Art Papier, MD. Wikipedia also names Lowell Goldsmith, MD as co-founder. The company says it sells to hospitals, individual clinicians, life-sciences companies and public health agencies. Its history page names no owner or investors.

Vendor milestones include the Skinsight patient app in 2006, an iPhone app in 2008, HL7 infobutton and SMART on FHIR support in 2012, DermExpert AI for iOS in 2017 and an API in 2021.

What does it do?

The clinician enters findings and patient context, and the builder ranks possible diagnoses. Condition pages list look-alikes, epidemiology and treatment. The homepage puts the library at more than 50,000 clinical images across skin tones and body sites, and the pricing page lists a skin-of-colour atlas as a strength. Images can be compared by skin tone. The pricing page also lists 400-plus patient handouts in English and Spanish, quizzes, CME credit for searches and guided workups.

VisualDx AI analyses images and sits inside paid plans. The homepage also mentions a Perplexity partnership and grounding of language-model answers in VisualDx content. No accuracy data accompany either.

Does it integrate and is it regulated?

The homepage promises EHR integration, single sign-on and API access with "major EHRs", but names none. HIPAA-compliant workflows and security documentation are available on request. The company lists no SOC 2 or HITRUST attestation.

A 2020 DermExpert FAQ says the product is not FDA approved and that VisualDx is exempt from FDA regulation. No FDA clearance is claimed for VisualDx AI.

What does the evidence say?

No peer-reviewed study evaluates VisualDx. The five papers tagged to it concern clinical decision support in general. They include a 2025 Oxford Open Digital Health report on implementing a decision support system in Botswana (PMID 41050646) and a 2023 JMIR Formative Research paper on a mobile decision support system in a resource-limited country (PMID 37815861), and neither is a test of VisualDx. A 2025 World Journal of Methodology paper on an "Electronic Pediatrician" prototype (PMID 40881228) is unrelated.

One paper gives context for the image library. A 2022 Rheumatology study (PMID 34718435) found racial disparities in how skin tones were represented in images of dermatomyositis rashes, which is the gap VisualDx's skin-of-colour coverage targets. The homepage statistics (a 55-day dermatologist wait, 40% unnecessary referrals) come from the vendor.

How much does VisualDx cost?

Core, the education plan, is billed annually at $249.99. Elite, for clinicians, is billed annually at $299.99 (visualdx.com/pricing, as of October 2026). The page shows a free trial of unstated length. If you cancel, there is no refund for the current period, but annual plans that auto-renew have a 30-day grace window for a full refund of the renewal. Small groups of two to five and large groups are quote only.

How does it compare?

DynaMed, UpToDate and Isabel DDx are the common alternatives for diagnosis support. VisualDx's edge is the matched-image comparison, so a physician who mostly needs a drug or guideline lookup is better served elsewhere.

The verdict

A clinician who sees skin findings weekly can test the $299.99 Elite plan on their own cases during the free trial. Do not buy it for the AI image feature until the vendor publishes data on it.

Editorial review last generated October 15, 2026. Synthesized from clinician sentiment, peer-reviewed coverage, and our editorial silo picks. Refined by hand where vendor facts change.

Pricing

What it costs

All tiers are custom-quoted. The vendor does not publish per-provider list pricing.

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Core (education)—USD 249.99Shown as $39.99 or $20.83 per month, billed annually. Free trial length is not stated. Annual plans that auto-renew have a 30-day grace period for a full refund of the renewed fee.
Elite (clinicians)—USD 299.99Shown as $49.99 or $24.99 per month, billed annually.
Groups and Enterprise——Contact for pricing, including small groups of 2 to 5 users.

Source: vendor pricing page. Last checked October 15, 2026.

Vendor stability

Who builds it

VisualDx (VisualDx) was founded in 1999 in US, putting it 27 years into market.

Peer-reviewed coverage

What the literature says

4 peer-reviewed studies indexed on PubMed evaluate VisualDx in clinical contexts. The most relevant are shown below, ranked by editorial relevance score combining title match, study design, recency, and journal tier.

Early Perspectives on Utilization of a Clinical Decision Support Tool: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Thatipelli S, Loth M, Rizvi R, et al.· Stud Health Technol Inform· 2025
We describe a quality improvement study to understand clinicians' perspectives on using a clinical decision support tool (CDS) for clinical diagnosis and education (VisualDx™) across an integrated healthcare system. Surveys, interviews, and secondary data were analyzed to understand the patterns of usage, associated barriers, facilitators, and suggestions influencing the CDS's adoption and usability. Overall, the CDS had multidimensional functionality, and outpatient primary care had the highest adoption. Key benefits included assistance in building differential diagnoses, mainly of 'd…
Experiences, challenges and lessons while implementing a clinical decision support system in Botswana.
Ndlovu K, Stein N, Gaopelo R, et al.· Oxf Open Digit Health· 2025Case Report
The use of information and communication technologies in healthcare has given rise to mobile health applications and services. For the developing world, mobile health has been hailed as being valuable for extending access to healthcare to underserved populations. More recently, mobile health applications support clinicians to quickly navigate decision making processes. An exemplar decision support system, VisualDx, was implemented in Botswana to provide reference materials at the point of care to support early diagnosis and management of complex dermatological conditions. This study shares ex…
Racial disparities in skin tone representation of dermatomyositis rashes: a systematic review.
Babool S, Bhai SF, Sanderson C, et al.· Rheumatology (Oxford)· 2022Systematic Review
This systemic review assesses skin tone representation in images of DM rashes in medical education literature. A review was performed of 59 dermatology, 11 neurology, 10 neuromuscular, 7 rheumatology and 6 internal medicine textbooks published between 2011 and 2021 and 3 online image databases (UpToDate, VisualDx and DermNet NZ) that were available through an online medical school library. After extracting images, images with poor lighting or unclear rashes were removed. Authors graded skin tone independently on the Massey and Martin Skin Colour Scale (MMSCS) from 1 (very light) to 10 (very d…
Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptance of a Mobile Clinical Decision Support System in a Resource-Limited Country: Exploratory Study.
Ndlovu K, Stein N, Gaopelo R, et al.· JMIR Form Res· 2023
In resource-limited countries, access to specialized health care services such as dermatology is limited. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) offer innovative solutions to address this challenge. However, the implementation of CDSSs is commonly associated with unique challenges. VisualDx-an exemplar CDSS-was recently implemented in Botswana to provide reference materials in support of the diagnosis and management of dermatological conditions. To inform the sustainable implementation of VisualDx in Botswana, it is important to evaluate the intended users' perceptions about the technology…

See all on PubMed