MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Anumana vs Etiometry Platform

Anumana's flagship algorithm flags reduced ejection fraction from a 10-second 12-lead ECG and posts the result in the EHR as a notification, so the buyer is a hospital's ECG workflow. Etiometry belongs in the ICU. Its platform pulls monitor, device and EHR data into one view, and the vendor lists four FDA-cleared risk indices for oxygen delivery, ventilation, lactate and acidosis. Three of the four are cleared only for patients up to 12 years old, which makes a pediatric cardiac ICU the natural buyer. openFDA shows 11 Etiometry clearances in total. The vendor says it supports SMART-on-FHIR integrations and signs BAAs, and states SOC 2, HIPAA and ISO 27001 compliance. Neither company publishes a price. A hospital with a cardiac ICU and an ECG workflow could license both without any overlap.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Anumana logo

Anumana

by Anumana

ECG-AI software that flags low ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac amyloidosis from standard 12-lead ECGs.

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

When to pick each one

Anumana

  • Flags reduced ejection fraction from a 10-second ECG
  • Result arrives as an EHR notification
Read the full Anumana review

Etiometry Platform

  • Four ICU risk indices the vendor calls FDA-cleared
  • SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001 and BAAs stated
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Anumana

37of 100

Competitive

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Anumana and Etiometry Platform
DimensionAnumanaEtiometry PlatformDifference
FDA clearance12 / 1212 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 210 / 21+14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Anumana

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo request only.

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Evidence

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAnumanaEtiometry Platform
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2010
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.