MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Anumana vs Glass Health

Anumana is a purchase for a cardiology service line. Its ECG algorithms went through FDA 510(k) clearance, the vendor points to CPT III codes for charge capture, and no price is listed, with access by demo request.

Glass Health publishes four prices in USD per month: $0 for Lite, $20 for Starter, $90 for Pro and $200 for Max. Lite and Starter show ad sponsorships. A physician or small clinic that wants a differential, an assessment and plan and an ambient scribe in one workflow is the buyer, and EHR integration for athenahealth, Epic, eClinicalWorks and Elation comes only on Max. Glass Health states no FDA status and openFDA has no record under its name. A small, non-randomized comparison of four NEJM cases in The Neurologist in 2024 had Glass AI correct on one, ChatGPT-4 on none and a diagnostic generator on all four. One tool is bought by a clinician for their own workflow and the other by a department.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Anumana logo

Anumana

by Anumana

ECG-AI software that flags low ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac amyloidosis from standard 12-lead ECGs.

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

When to pick each one

Anumana

  • FDA 510(k)-cleared ECG algorithms
  • CPT III codes listed for charge capture
Read the full Anumana review

Glass Health

  • $0 Lite, $20 Starter, $90 Pro per month
  • Max at $200 per month adds EHR integration
Read the full Glass Health review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Anumana

37of 100

Competitive

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Anumana and Glass Health
DimensionAnumanaGlass HealthDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 106 / 10-6
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.83.4 / 4.8-3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 218.4 / 21+6.3
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 128.4 / 12-5.4
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.52.5 / 2.5-1.2
Years in market0 / 64.2 / 6-4.2

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Anumana

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo request only.

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

Evidence

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAnumanaGlass Health
Free tierNo / unverifiedYes
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Elation
Foundedn/a2021
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.