MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Anumana vs Sepsis ImmunoScore

Each tool has an FDA decision, so regulation does not separate them. A cardiology chief would be the one to sign for Anumana, whose four ECG-AI 510(k)s date from 2023 to 2026. A 2026 JACC Advances paper validated an AI-ECG low ejection fraction algorithm at several sites, and its link to the cleared algorithm is not verified.

Prenosis holds a De Novo, DEN230036, dated April 2, 2024, for Sepsis ImmunoScore. The score draws on up to 22 EHR parameters, including procalcitonin, CRP and lactate, and sorts adults admitted to the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis into four bands for deterioration risk within 24 hours. The vendor states it has not been validated in the ICU or on labor and delivery units, so a sepsis program focused on ICU patients cannot lean on the De Novo for that setting. A 2024 NEJM AI paper reports its development and validation, and the vendor page lists Prenosis authors on it. The homepage names Carle Health as a deployment.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Anumana logo

Anumana

by Anumana

ECG-AI software that flags low ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac amyloidosis from standard 12-lead ECGs.

AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.

When to pick each one

Anumana

  • Four ECG-AI 510(k) clearances since 2023
  • Standard 12-lead ECG input
Read the full Anumana review

Sepsis ImmunoScore

  • FDA De Novo for sepsis, DEN230036
  • Adults with suspected sepsis in ED or hospital
Read the full Sepsis ImmunoScore review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Anumana

37of 100

Competitive

Sepsis ImmunoScore

37of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Anumana and Sepsis ImmunoScore
DimensionAnumanaSepsis ImmunoScoreDifference
FDA clearance12 / 1212 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 2114.7 / 210
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 60 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Anumana

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo request only.

Sepsis ImmunoScore

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo or contact only.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecAnumanaSepsis ImmunoScore
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/an/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.