Anumana vs Sepsis ImmunoScore
Each tool has an FDA decision, so regulation does not separate them. A cardiology chief would be the one to sign for Anumana, whose four ECG-AI 510(k)s date from 2023 to 2026. A 2026 JACC Advances paper validated an AI-ECG low ejection fraction algorithm at several sites, and its link to the cleared algorithm is not verified.
Prenosis holds a De Novo, DEN230036, dated April 2, 2024, for Sepsis ImmunoScore. The score draws on up to 22 EHR parameters, including procalcitonin, CRP and lactate, and sorts adults admitted to the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis into four bands for deterioration risk within 24 hours. The vendor states it has not been validated in the ICU or on labor and delivery units, so a sepsis program focused on ICU patients cannot lean on the De Novo for that setting. A 2024 NEJM AI paper reports its development and validation, and the vendor page lists Prenosis authors on it. The homepage names Carle Health as a deployment.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Anumana
by Anumana
ECG-AI software that flags low ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac amyloidosis from standard 12-lead ECGs.

Sepsis ImmunoScore
by Prenosis
AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.
When to pick each one
Anumana
- Four ECG-AI 510(k) clearances since 2023
- Standard 12-lead ECG input
Sepsis ImmunoScore
- FDA De Novo for sepsis, DEN230036
- Adults with suspected sepsis in ED or hospital
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Anumana
37of 100
Sepsis ImmunoScore
37of 100
| Dimension | Anumana | Sepsis ImmunoScore | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 12 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 0 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 0 / 4.8 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 14.7 / 21 | 14.7 / 21 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Anumana
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo request only. |
Sepsis ImmunoScore
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo or contact only. |
Evidence
Anumana
FDA decisions
K253801 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-07
ECG-AI Cardiac Amyloidosis (CA) 12-Lead Algorithm (1040)
K252360 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-03-28
ECG-AI Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) 12-Lead algorithm (1020)
K250652 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-07-28
ECG-AI Low Ejection Fraction (LEF) 12-Lead algorithm (1010)
K232699 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-09-28
Low Ejection Fraction AI-ECG Algorithm
Peer-reviewed
3 PubMed records name Anumana.
- A Pragmatic Trial Evaluating the Impact of the Anumana Clinical Decision Support Tool for Guideline-Directed Management of Heart Failure (ACT-HF): Clinical trial design and methods. (opens in new tab)
- Comment on "A pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of the anumana clinical decision support tool for guideline-directed management of heart failure (ACT-HF): Clinical trial design and methods". (opens in new tab)
- Identification and risk stratification of coronary disease by artificial intelligence-enabled ECG. (opens in new tab)
Sepsis ImmunoScore
FDA decisions
DEN230036 (opens in new tab)De Novo2024-04-02
Sepsis ImmunoScore
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name Sepsis ImmunoScore.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Anumana | Sepsis ImmunoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
