Avo vs PaceMate
PaceMate's security page lists ISO/IEC 27001:2022, HITRUST r2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 and HIPAA with a BAA, and the platform is hosted on AWS. Avo's homepage footer states SOC 2 Type II. The vendor lists bi-directional links with Epic and Oracle Health and an athenahealth link through its FHIR API. Its Auto-Triage ranks device alerts by clinical priority, and the vendor claims a 61% drop in physician alert burden and 73% fewer loop recorder false-positive alerts. Four tiers (Software, Flexible, Premium, Elite) show no amounts.
An electrophysiology device clinic running remote monitoring of cardiac implants buys PaceMate. Avo goes to a health system's clinical leadership. A hospital security team asked to approve both would read PaceMate's attestations as the broader set, and the two tools serve different buyers.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
PaceMate
- ISO 27001, HITRUST r2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3
- Bi-directional Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth
- Auto-Triage for cardiac device alerts
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Avo
18of 100
PaceMate
47of 100
| Dimension | Avo | PaceMate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 6 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -4 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 1.7 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 3.4 / 4.8 | 4.8 / 4.8 | -1.4 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 21 | 14.7 / 21 | -14.7 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 4.5 / 9 | -4.5 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Avo
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The pricing page returns 404; the site offers a demo booking only. |
PaceMate
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Avo
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
PaceMate
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
3 PubMed records name PaceMate.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Avo | PaceMate |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic, athenahealth, MEDITECH | Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | n/a |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.