MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Bayesian Health vs Etiometry Platform

PubMed papers on the Etiometry platform include a 2025 Critical Care Medicine paper on vasoactive infusion duration after pediatric cardiac surgery and a 2024 JTCVS Open validation of the oxygen-delivery index in an adult cardiovascular ICU. The vendor lists four FDA-cleared risk indices for oxygen delivery, ventilation, lactate and acidosis, with 11 clearances on record since 2015. IDO2 covers post-surgical children and adults 18 and over, while the other three are indicated for children up to 12. In observational data the vendor claims up to 36% shorter stays and up to 41% fewer ICU readmissions. Its buyers are pediatric and adult cardiac surgery ICU directors.

Bayesian Health serves a hospital medicine chief watching ward patients for sepsis. These are separate purchases, because Etiometry reads bedside monitor data in post-surgical and ventilated ICU patients and Bayesian reads EHR data for sepsis risk. Bayesian's evidence is a 2022 Nature Medicine study of the TREWS system across five hospitals and 764,707 encounters, with 82% sensitivity and alerts 5.7 hours earlier according to the company's release.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bayesian Health logo

Bayesian Health

by Bayesian Health

Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

When to pick each one

Bayesian Health

  • Vendor says it monitors every patient continuously
  • FDA-cleared sepsis flag for adults 18 and over
  • 2022 Nature Medicine study across five hospitals
Read the full Bayesian Health review

Etiometry Platform

  • Vendor lists four FDA-cleared ICU risk indices
  • IDO2 indicated for post-surgical children and adults
  • Aggregates monitor and EHR data, SMART-on-FHIR
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Bayesian Health

33of 100

Competitive

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Bayesian Health and Etiometry Platform
DimensionBayesian HealthEtiometry PlatformDifference
FDA clearance12 / 1212 / 120
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 1010 / 10-10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 210 / 21+8.4
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal6 / 123 / 12+3
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market0 / 66 / 6-6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Bayesian Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Evidence

Bayesian Health

FDA decisions

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecBayesian HealthEtiometry Platform
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedYes
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Foundedn/a2010
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.