Bayesian Health vs Etiometry Platform
PubMed papers on the Etiometry platform include a 2025 Critical Care Medicine paper on vasoactive infusion duration after pediatric cardiac surgery and a 2024 JTCVS Open validation of the oxygen-delivery index in an adult cardiovascular ICU. The vendor lists four FDA-cleared risk indices for oxygen delivery, ventilation, lactate and acidosis, with 11 clearances on record since 2015. IDO2 covers post-surgical children and adults 18 and over, while the other three are indicated for children up to 12. In observational data the vendor claims up to 36% shorter stays and up to 41% fewer ICU readmissions. Its buyers are pediatric and adult cardiac surgery ICU directors.
Bayesian Health serves a hospital medicine chief watching ward patients for sepsis. These are separate purchases, because Etiometry reads bedside monitor data in post-surgical and ventilated ICU patients and Bayesian reads EHR data for sepsis risk. Bayesian's evidence is a 2022 Nature Medicine study of the TREWS system across five hospitals and 764,707 encounters, with 82% sensitivity and alerts 5.7 hours earlier according to the company's release.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Bayesian Health
by Bayesian Health
Sepsis flagging software that monitors EHR data continuously and shows a high-risk flag in the chart. FDA 510(k) cleared April 2026.

Etiometry Platform
by Etiometry · founded 2010
ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.
When to pick each one
Bayesian Health
- Vendor says it monitors every patient continuously
- FDA-cleared sepsis flag for adults 18 and over
- 2022 Nature Medicine study across five hospitals
Etiometry Platform
- Vendor lists four FDA-cleared ICU risk indices
- IDO2 indicated for post-surgical children and adults
- Aggregates monitor and EHR data, SMART-on-FHIR
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Bayesian Health
33of 100
Etiometry Platform
38of 100
| Dimension | Bayesian Health | Etiometry Platform | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 12 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 10 / 10 | -10 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 0 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 0 / 4.8 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 8.4 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +8.4 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 6 / 12 | 3 / 12 | +3 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 | -6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Bayesian Health
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Etiometry Platform
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo request only. |
Evidence
Bayesian Health
FDA decisions
K250680 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-30
Bayesian Health Sepsis Flagging Device
Peer-reviewed
1 PubMed record names Bayesian Health.
Etiometry Platform
FDA decisions
K254066 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-03
Etiometry Platform
K241479 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-02-12
Etiometry Platform (DAV 5.4 RAE 9.2)
K223578 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-07-07
T3 Platform software
K213423 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-01-06
T3 Platform software
K213230 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-06-22
T3 Platform Software
Show 6 more
K202306 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-11-25
T3 Platform software
K190273 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-12-08
T3 Platform software
K163065 (opens in new tab)510(k)2017-05-26
T3 Software
K152258 (opens in new tab)510(k)2016-03-31
T3 Software
K151715 (opens in new tab)510(k)2015-10-29
T3 Software
K142732 (opens in new tab)510(k)2015-03-04
T3 Software
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Bayesian Health | Etiometry Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | 2010 |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
