MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

C8 Health vs Etiometry Platform

The vendor labels its outcome figures for Etiometry observational: length of stay down by up to 36%, ICU readmissions down by up to 41%, ventilation time down by up to 30%. Published work on its indices includes a 2025 Critical Care Medicine paper on vasoactive infusion duration after pediatric cardiac surgery. Etiometry holds eleven 510(k) clearances, the latest K254066 for a Cardiogenic Shock Tool in April 2026. Three of its four risk indices are cleared only for patients up to 12 years old. IDO2 covers post-surgical patients 0 to 12 years weighing 2 kg or more, and adults 18 and older who are not on mechanical circulatory support.

Etiometry suits a pediatric cardiac ICU or critical care service. C8 Health is sold to health systems and its evidence is perioperative: its proof library reports ERAS compliance rising from 65% to 88% in five months at MetroHealth, an internal study reported by the vendor. Neither company posts a price.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

C8 Health logo

C8 Health

by C8 Health Inc. · founded 2019

Protocol knowledge platform for hospitals, with an AI assistant that answers only from the hospital's vetted content.

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

When to pick each one

C8 Health

  • ERAS tracking, vendor-reported 65% to 88%
  • Sold to health systems, perioperative evidence
Read the full C8 Health review

Etiometry Platform

  • Eleven 510(k) clearances, newest April 2026
  • Four FDA-cleared ICU risk indices
  • ISO 27001, SOC 2 and BAA stated
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

C8 Health

32of 100

Competitive

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for C8 Health and Etiometry Platform
DimensionC8 HealthEtiometry PlatformDifference
FDA clearance0 / 1212 / 12-12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 1010 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 210 / 21+8.4
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market4.2 / 66 / 6-1.8

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

C8 Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Evidence

C8 Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names C8 Health.

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecC8 HealthEtiometry Platform
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20192010
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.