MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

DermaSensor vs KATE

The vendor says its DERM-SUCCESS multi-reader study found 96% sensitivity and 97% NPV for a Monitor result. The vendor's evidence page also lists a prospective UPMC evaluation, which it calls the first independent investigator-initiated US study, with specificity of 9.4% at the lowest cut point. Mednition's 2019 release cites a vendor study claiming triage accuracy up 26.9% (93.2% for high-acuity patients) at Adventist Health White Memorial, still in peer review when announced. Three PubMed papers by Mednition-employed authors do not name the product.

DermaSensor goes to primary care physicians who want a second look at suspicious lesions. KATE goes to emergency department nursing leaders, with Adventist Health White Memorial and Adventist Health Glendale named as customers. The two products read different inputs, a spectroscopy scan of skin and EHR data at triage.

DermaSensor's FDA route was De Novo, decided in January 2024 under 21 CFR 878.1830. KATE Sepsis holds a Breakthrough Device Designation from November 14, 2023, which is not a clearance.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

DermaSensor logo

DermaSensor

by DermaSensor · founded 2009

Handheld spectroscopy device giving primary care physicians an AI score on skin lesions already judged suspicious.

KATE logo

KATE

by Mednition · founded 2014

KATE AI recommends emergency department triage acuity and flags sepsis risk from EHR data at triage.

When to pick each one

DermaSensor

  • Vendor-run DERM-SUCCESS reader study, 96% sensitivity
  • UPMC prospective study, called independent by the vendor
Read the full DermaSensor review

KATE

  • Triage acuity recommendation for emergency nurses
  • Sepsis risk flag from EHR data at triage
Read the full KATE review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

DermaSensor

49of 100

Solid choice

KATE

12of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for DermaSensor and KATE
DimensionDermaSensorKATEDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 100 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.60 / 5.60
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.80 / 4.80
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers14.7 / 210 / 21+14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review4.5 / 90 / 9+4.5
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 66 / 60

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

DermaSensor

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo published price for an outright purchase. Monthly rental subscription, one-year device use agreement with try-and-return option.

KATE

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecDermaSensorKATE
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedNot specified
Founded20092014
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.