Epic Sepsis Model vs Sepsis ImmunoScore
Prenosis's Sepsis ImmunoScore holds FDA De Novo DEN230036, decided April 2, 2024. It scores adults admitted to the ED or hospital with suspected sepsis from up to 22 EHR parameters in four risk bands, and the vendor says it has not been validated in ICU or labor and delivery units. Its NEJM AI development and validation paper is vendor-run, no EHR is named on the product page, and no price is public.
Both tools address inpatient and ED sepsis, so a hospital choosing sepsis software can weigh them. The Epic Sepsis Model has no record on openFDA and runs only inside Epic. The 2021 Michigan Medicine study of the first version measured an AUROC of 0.63 with 67 percent of sepsis cases missed, and the 2026 prospective study of version 2 across four US systems found AUROC of 0.82 to 0.92 but PPV of 0.13 to 0.26 and a high alert burden. For a hospital that must buy FDA-authorized sepsis software, the Epic Sepsis Model loses. A hospital already on Epic that is willing to tune its own thresholds can run it within the EHR it licenses.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Epic Sepsis Model
by Epic Systems
Sepsis risk score calculated every 15 minutes inside the Epic EHR, with alert thresholds set by each hospital.

Sepsis ImmunoScore
by Prenosis
AI sepsis risk score from up to 22 EHR parameters for adults with suspected sepsis in the ED or hospital, FDA De Novo authorized.
When to pick each one
Epic Sepsis Model
- Delivered within the Epic license
- Hospital-set alert thresholds
Sepsis ImmunoScore
- FDA De Novo DEN230036, April 2024
- Up to 22 EHR parameters, four risk bands
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Epic Sepsis Model
41of 100
Sepsis ImmunoScore
37of 100
| Dimension | Epic Sepsis Model | Sepsis ImmunoScore | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 0 / 12 | 12 / 12 | -12 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 0 / 5.6 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 0 / 4.8 | 0 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 21 / 21 | 14.7 / 21 | +6.3 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 9 / 9 | 0 / 9 | +9 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Epic Sepsis Model
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Delivered within Epic licensing. |
Sepsis ImmunoScore
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo or contact only. |
Evidence
Epic Sepsis Model
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
5 PubMed records name Epic Sepsis Model.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Externally Validated Epic Clinical Decision Support Tools. (opens in new tab)
- Evaluation of Sepsis Prediction Models before Onset of Treatment. (opens in new tab)
- Multicenter Prospective Validation of an Updated Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model. (opens in new tab)
Sepsis ImmunoScore
FDA decisions
DEN230036 (opens in new tab)De Novo2024-04-02
Sepsis ImmunoScore
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name Sepsis ImmunoScore.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Epic Sepsis Model | Sepsis ImmunoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
