Etiometry Platform vs MyoVista wavECG
A cardiology clinic that wants a 12-lead resting ECG is HeartSciences' buyer, and an ICU team that wants risk indices is Etiometry's. The two purchases do not overlap. The wavECG was cleared in October 2026 (K260005) without the AI-ECG algorithm, and the company says it does not intend to commercialize the device without a cleared algorithm and gives no timeline. The vendor's footer states its AI-ECG products are not commercially available in the United States. The vendor describes MyoVista Insights as hosting third-party AI-ECG results, and the homepage links an Epic showroom listing. A business combination with Fortitude Mining Holdings is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026.
On the ICU side, Etiometry's latest clearance, K254066 in April 2026, is a Cardiogenic Shock Tool. The vendor lists its four risk indices separately, and the oxygen-delivery index covers adults 18 and over not on mechanical circulatory support. Pricing runs through a demo form.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Etiometry Platform
by Etiometry · founded 2010
ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

MyoVista wavECG
by HeartSciences
12-lead resting ECG device for cardiology clinics, FDA 510(k) cleared in October 2026 without its AI-ECG algorithm.
When to pick each one
Etiometry Platform
- Cardiogenic Shock Tool K254066, cleared April 2026
- Oxygen-delivery index covers adults 18 and over
MyoVista wavECG
- 12-lead wavECG cleared October 2026, no AI-ECG algorithm
- Epic showroom listing on its homepage
- Nasdaq-listed since June 2022
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Etiometry Platform
38of 100
MyoVista wavECG
31of 100
| Dimension | Etiometry Platform | MyoVista wavECG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 12 / 12 | 0 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 10 / 10 | 6 / 10 | +4 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 1.7 / 5.6 | -1.7 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 1.9 / 4.8 | -1.9 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 21 | 0 / 21 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Etiometry Platform
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo request only. |
MyoVista wavECG
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Etiometry Platform
FDA decisions
K254066 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-03
Etiometry Platform
K241479 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-02-12
Etiometry Platform (DAV 5.4 RAE 9.2)
K223578 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-07-07
T3 Platform software
K213423 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-01-06
T3 Platform software
K213230 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-06-22
T3 Platform Software
Show 6 more
K202306 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-11-25
T3 Platform software
K190273 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-12-08
T3 Platform software
K163065 (opens in new tab)510(k)2017-05-26
T3 Software
K152258 (opens in new tab)510(k)2016-03-31
T3 Software
K151715 (opens in new tab)510(k)2015-10-29
T3 Software
K142732 (opens in new tab)510(k)2015-03-04
T3 Software
MyoVista wavECG
FDA decisions
K260005 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-10-05
MyoVista wavECG (DG-200-B15-003)
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Etiometry Platform | MyoVista wavECG |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Epic |
| Founded | 2010 | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
