Etiometry Platform vs Octagos
Etiometry, founded in 2010 and headquartered in Dedham, aggregates ICU monitor and EHR data into risk indices. Beside its CE Mark it states Health Canada, UAE and Saudi licenses, and a Hamilton Medical partnership for ICU respiratory care was announced in September 2026. An ICU director has no reason to shop Octagos, and a device-clinic cardiologist has none to shop Etiometry.
Octagos is bought by a cardiology practice that runs a device clinic and wants implantable device transmissions triaged. By the vendor's account, Atlas AI makes the first pass, an IBHRE-certified US specialist finalizes the report, and a physician e-signs it. Epic via SMART on FHIR, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent and NextGen are named, and the vendor states HIPAA compliance plus SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3. Its AI overview page makes no regulatory claim for Atlas AI, and openFDA returns no record for Octagos as applicant or device name. A 2025 JACC Advances study tied to the company, summarized by the vendor, reports 99.1% sensitivity against 70.8% for technicians across 690,673 transmissions. Tiers are Pro, Premium, Flex and Custom with no amounts posted.
Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Etiometry Platform
by Etiometry · founded 2010
ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

Octagos
by Octagos
Remote cardiac device monitoring where AI triages implantable device transmissions and US specialists review them, for cardiology clinics.
When to pick each one
Etiometry Platform
- Hamilton Medical ICU respiratory partnership, September 2026
- Vendor states Health Canada, UAE and Saudi licenses
- Aggregates ICU monitor and EHR data into risk indices
Octagos
- SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 and HIPAA stated
- Epic via SMART on FHIR, four more EHRs named
- Vendor says specialist review and physician e-signature on every report
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Etiometry Platform
38of 100
Octagos
43of 100
| Dimension | Etiometry Platform | Octagos | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA clearance | 12 / 12 | 0 / 12 | +12 |
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 0 / 5.6 | 2.8 / 5.6 | -2.8 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 0 / 4.8 | 4.8 / 4.8 | -4.8 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 1.2 | 0 / 1.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 21 | 14.7 / 21 | -14.7 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.3 / 2.5 | 1.3 / 2.5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 6 / 6 | 0 / 6 | +6 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Etiometry Platform
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. Demo request only. |
Octagos
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. |
Evidence
Etiometry Platform
FDA decisions
K254066 (opens in new tab)510(k)2026-04-03
Etiometry Platform
K241479 (opens in new tab)510(k)2025-02-12
Etiometry Platform (DAV 5.4 RAE 9.2)
K223578 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-07-07
T3 Platform software
K213423 (opens in new tab)510(k)2023-01-06
T3 Platform software
K213230 (opens in new tab)510(k)2022-06-22
T3 Platform Software
Show 6 more
K202306 (opens in new tab)510(k)2020-11-25
T3 Platform software
K190273 (opens in new tab)510(k)2019-12-08
T3 Platform software
K163065 (opens in new tab)510(k)2017-05-26
T3 Software
K152258 (opens in new tab)510(k)2016-03-31
T3 Software
K151715 (opens in new tab)510(k)2015-10-29
T3 Software
K142732 (opens in new tab)510(k)2015-03-04
T3 Software
Octagos
FDA decisions
No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.
Peer-reviewed
2 PubMed records name Octagos.
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Etiometry Platform | Octagos |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Not specified | Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent, NextGen |
| Founded | 2010 | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full decision support comparison
Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.
