MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Etiometry Platform vs Octagos

Etiometry, founded in 2010 and headquartered in Dedham, aggregates ICU monitor and EHR data into risk indices. Beside its CE Mark it states Health Canada, UAE and Saudi licenses, and a Hamilton Medical partnership for ICU respiratory care was announced in September 2026. An ICU director has no reason to shop Octagos, and a device-clinic cardiologist has none to shop Etiometry.

Octagos is bought by a cardiology practice that runs a device clinic and wants implantable device transmissions triaged. By the vendor's account, Atlas AI makes the first pass, an IBHRE-certified US specialist finalizes the report, and a physician e-signs it. Epic via SMART on FHIR, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent and NextGen are named, and the vendor states HIPAA compliance plus SOC 2 Type 2 and SOC 3. Its AI overview page makes no regulatory claim for Atlas AI, and openFDA returns no record for Octagos as applicant or device name. A 2025 JACC Advances study tied to the company, summarized by the vendor, reports 99.1% sensitivity against 70.8% for technicians across 690,673 transmissions. Tiers are Pro, Premium, Flex and Custom with no amounts posted.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

Octagos logo

Octagos

by Octagos

Remote cardiac device monitoring where AI triages implantable device transmissions and US specialists review them, for cardiology clinics.

When to pick each one

Etiometry Platform

  • Hamilton Medical ICU respiratory partnership, September 2026
  • Vendor states Health Canada, UAE and Saudi licenses
  • Aggregates ICU monitor and EHR data into risk indices
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Octagos

  • SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 and HIPAA stated
  • Epic via SMART on FHIR, four more EHRs named
  • Vendor says specialist review and physician e-signature on every report
Read the full Octagos review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive

Octagos

43of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Etiometry Platform and Octagos
DimensionEtiometry PlatformOctagosDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 1010 / 100
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.84.8 / 4.8-4.8
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 2114.7 / 21-14.7
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Octagos

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEtiometry PlatformOctagos
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, medent, NextGen
Founded2010n/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.