MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Etiometry Platform vs Triomics

Triomics works for a cancer center's trial-screening office. PRISM screens upcoming patients against active trials every night and hands coordinators a cited worklist, and the vendor also offers visit preparation and cancer registry curation. It lists Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed and Cerner and says it is approved on the Epic App Marketplace. Memorial Sloan Kettering announced a deployment in November 2025 and disclosed institutional financial interests in Triomics. A PRISM paper appeared in NPJ Digital Medicine in 2024, and the vendor says matching accuracy was about 95%. The PRISM page labels some of its own metrics as placeholders, the vendor makes no FDA claim, and openFDA returns no record for Triomics as applicant or device name. Etiometry is a separate purchase for ICU teams: the vendor says 170-plus studies were enabled by its platform.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Etiometry Platform logo

Etiometry Platform

by Etiometry · founded 2010

ICU data platform that aggregates monitor and EHR data and runs four FDA-cleared physiologic risk indices.

Triomics logo

Triomics

by triomics inc.

Oncology AI agents that match patients to clinical trials, prepare visits and curate cancer registries from notes, reports and faxes.

When to pick each one

Etiometry Platform

  • Four FDA-cleared ICU risk indices
  • Intended to aid decisions, per the vendor
  • Four cleared ICU risk indices, one for adults
Read the full Etiometry Platform review

Triomics

  • Nightly trial screening for cancer centers
  • Lists Epic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed and Cerner
  • Visit prep and registry curation
Read the full Triomics review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Etiometry Platform

38of 100

Competitive

Triomics

12of 100

Tracked
Score by dimension for Etiometry Platform and Triomics
DimensionEtiometry PlatformTriomicsDifference
FDA clearance12 / 120 / 12+12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA10 / 100 / 10+10
EHR integrations (count)0 / 5.62.8 / 5.6-2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)0 / 4.83.4 / 4.8-3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 210 / 210
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 90 / 90
Funding & adoption signal3 / 123 / 120
Pricing transparency1.3 / 2.51.3 / 2.50
Years in market6 / 60 / 6+6

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Etiometry Platform

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request only.

Triomics

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. Demo request and synthetic-data sandbox offered.

Evidence

Etiometry Platform

FDA decisions

Show 6 more

Triomics

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of November 2, 2026.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEtiometry PlatformTriomics
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAAYesNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo / unverified
EHR integrationsNot specifiedEpic, OncoEMR, iKnowMed, Cerner
Founded2010n/a
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.