Evidently vs Matic
Matic, Inc. in Dallas sells a platform for physicians, practices and patients. Scribematic's ambient notes sit beside coding suggestions, evidence search and chart prep. The vendor claims 99% accurate notes, about 90 minutes of admin time returned a day and 83% less after-hours charting. It shows HIPAA, SOC 2 and ISO 27001:2022 badges, gives no SOC 2 type, and says notes go into the EHR without naming which one. Matic's pages are written for physicians and practices, while Evidently's vendor-listed customers are all health systems, and its pages name Epic, so neither tool has the other's buyer. Matic's pages address a physician group wanting a scribe with coding help. A health-system CIO wanting notes drafted from the full chart is Evidently's. The KLAS Arch Collaborative result Evidently cites at Iowa, a +31.7 Net EHR Experience Score, is vendor-reported.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026
When to pick each one
Evidently
- Vendor lists Iowa, Allina, UnityPoint and UNC
- Notes drafted from the full chart, per vendor
- KLAS Arch result at Iowa, vendor-reported
Matic
- Ambient notes with coding suggestions and evidence search
- ISO 27001:2022 badge shown
- 90+ languages, per vendor
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Evidently
20of 100
Matic
22of 100
| Dimension | Evidently | Matic | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 13 | 13 / 13 | -13 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 6.3 / 21 | 0 / 21 | +6.3 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 4.8 / 12 | 0 / 12 | +4.8 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 3 / 12 | 0 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Evidently
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. No pricing page is published; the site offers Talk to Us and Book a live demo. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from evidently.com (opens in new tab).
Matic
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. The site offers a demo request and "Talk to an Expert" only. |
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Evidently | Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic | Not specified |
| Founded | n/a | n/a |
| HQ | US | US |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.

