Evidently vs TORTUS
An NHS England evaluation co-run with the vendor covered TORTUS at 9 sites and 17,000+ patients. The product listens to the consultation and files notes, letters, referrals and codes into the record after the clinician approves. The vendor says it is integrated with Epic and Cerner and holds UKCA Class IIa status, and it names London Ambulance Service's telephone clinical hub and St George's emergency department as deployments. A G-Cloud 14 listing, now expired, put a 3-month pilot of up to 100 licenses at GBP 15,000 excl. VAT, and no current price is public.
Evidently works from the chart, and its pages describe CDI, HCC capture and denial appeals. The homepage says the product goes beyond what was said in the room. An Epic hospital that wants the consultation itself documented picks TORTUS, and one that wants coding gaps found in the chart picks Evidently. For an NHS trust, Evidently loses, since its named customers are US health systems and TORTUS's named deployments are NHS sites. Evidently's prices come after a demo.
AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Evidently
by Evidently, Inc.
Clinical data intelligence for health systems: chart review, drafted notes and CDI and coding suggestions inside the EHR.
TORTUS
by TORTUS AI · founded 2022
Ambient voice documentation for NHS clinicians: notes, letters, referrals and codes filed into the record after clinician approval.
When to pick each one
Evidently
- Epic hospital after CDI and coding gaps
- Vendor pages describe HCC capture and denial appeals
TORTUS
- NHS trust or ED capturing the consultation
- Epic and Cerner integrations, vendor-stated
- UKCA Class IIa, vendor-stated
Score
Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.
Evidently
20of 100
TORTUS
33of 100
| Dimension | Evidently | TORTUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA | 0 / 13 | 0 / 13 | 0 |
| EHR integrations (count) | 6.3 / 21 | 6.3 / 21 | 0 |
| Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena) | 4.8 / 12 | 8.4 / 12 | -3.6 |
| Bidirectional write-back | 0 / 5.2 | 0 / 5.2 | 0 |
| Peer-reviewed papers | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 | 0 |
| RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 |
| Funding & adoption signal | 3 / 12 | 6 / 12 | -3 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 | 0 |
| Years in market | 0 / 6 | 4.2 / 6 | -4.2 |
Scroll horizontally to see every column.
Pricing
Evidently
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | n/a | n/a | No public price. No pricing page is published; the site offers Talk to Us and Book a live demo. |
Verified November 2, 2026 from evidently.com (opens in new tab).
TORTUS
| Tier | Monthly | Annual | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quote only | n/a | n/a | No public price. The pricing page returned a 404. |
Verified October 14, 2026 from tortus.ai (opens in new tab).
Compliance and integrations
Documented from each vendor’s own pages.
| Spec | Evidently | TORTUS |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| EHR integrations | Epic | Epic, Cerner |
| Founded | n/a | 2022 |
| HQ | US | UK |
Scroll horizontally to see both columns.
Common questions
Open the full ai medical scribes comparison
The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.
