MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Evidently vs TORTUS

An NHS England evaluation co-run with the vendor covered TORTUS at 9 sites and 17,000+ patients. The product listens to the consultation and files notes, letters, referrals and codes into the record after the clinician approves. The vendor says it is integrated with Epic and Cerner and holds UKCA Class IIa status, and it names London Ambulance Service's telephone clinical hub and St George's emergency department as deployments. A G-Cloud 14 listing, now expired, put a 3-month pilot of up to 100 licenses at GBP 15,000 excl. VAT, and no current price is public.

Evidently works from the chart, and its pages describe CDI, HCC capture and denial appeals. The homepage says the product goes beyond what was said in the room. An Epic hospital that wants the consultation itself documented picks TORTUS, and one that wants coding gaps found in the chart picks Evidently. For an NHS trust, Evidently loses, since its named customers are US health systems and TORTUS's named deployments are NHS sites. Evidently's prices come after a demo.

AI medical scribes · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Evidently logo

Evidently

by Evidently, Inc.

Clinical data intelligence for health systems: chart review, drafted notes and CDI and coding suggestions inside the EHR.

TORTUS logo

TORTUS

by TORTUS AI · founded 2022

Ambient voice documentation for NHS clinicians: notes, letters, referrals and codes filed into the record after clinician approval.

When to pick each one

Evidently

  • Epic hospital after CDI and coding gaps
  • Vendor pages describe HCC capture and denial appeals
Read the full Evidently review

TORTUS

  • NHS trust or ED capturing the consultation
  • Epic and Cerner integrations, vendor-stated
  • UKCA Class IIa, vendor-stated
Read the full TORTUS review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Evidently

20of 100

Niche fit

TORTUS

33of 100

Competitive
Score by dimension for Evidently and TORTUS
DimensionEvidentlyTORTUSDifference
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA0 / 130 / 130
EHR integrations (count)6.3 / 216.3 / 210
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)4.8 / 128.4 / 12-3.6
Bidirectional write-back0 / 5.20 / 5.20
Peer-reviewed papers0 / 70 / 70
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 30 / 30
Funding & adoption signal3 / 126 / 12-3
Pricing transparency2.5 / 52.5 / 50
Years in market0 / 64.2 / 6-4.2

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Evidently

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price. No pricing page is published; the site offers Talk to Us and Book a live demo.

Verified November 2, 2026 from evidently.com (opens in new tab).

TORTUS

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Quote onlyn/an/aNo public price. The pricing page returned a 404.

Verified October 14, 2026 from tortus.ai (opens in new tab).

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecEvidentlyTORTUS
Free tierNo / unverifiedNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsEpicEpic, Cerner
Foundedn/a2022
HQUSUK

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full ai medical scribes comparison

The best AI medical scribe for most US physicians is Abridge for hospital systems, Freed AI for solo practice (plans from $39 to $119 per month as of October 2026), Heidi Health for multilingual capture, and DAX Copilot for Microsoft-shop hospitals. Each pick below names its primary EHR integration, pricing model, and the clinician communities that surface it most often. Enterprise scribes are quote-based, with third-party estimates of roughly $208 to $600 per provider per month as of October 2026.