MedAI Verdict
All comparisons

Glass Health vs Zio

A 2024 report in The Neurologist scored GLASS AI at 1 of 4, ChatGPT-4 at 0 of 4 and the diagnostic generator at 4 of 4 on four NEJM cases, a small non-randomized comparison of a differential tool on case vignettes. iRhythm points to a 2019 Nature Medicine paper on a deep neural network for ambulatory ECG arrhythmias as the basis of its algorithm, a 2019 systematic review covers arrhythmia detection with the Zio patch, and the 99% physician-agreement figure on end-of-wear reports is iRhythm's own claim.

Glass sells to the clinician by subscription, $0 to $200 per month, with ads on Lite and Starter and Pro at $90 ad-free. Its buyer wants note drafting, billing and coding suggestions and a cited differential. Zio has no public price and is billed to payers through Medicare-enrolled IDTFs. One product documents the visit and the other records rhythm at home, and the physician who wants an arrhythmia work-up on a patient at home is the Zio customer.

Decision support · Reviewed November 2, 2026

Glass Health logo

Glass Health

by Glass Health · founded 2021

DDx plus literature-grounded A&P plus ambient scribe in one workflow.

ZI

Zio

by iRhythm Technologies · founded 2006

Zio ECG patch service: a deep-learning algorithm flags arrhythmias, cardiac technicians validate them, and a physician report follows.

When to pick each one

Glass Health

  • Pro is $90 per month and ad-free
  • Note drafting with billing and coding suggestions
  • BAAs offered, vendor-stated
Read the full Glass Health review

Zio

  • Ambulatory ECG patch monitoring service
  • Billed to payers through IDTFs, no clinic price
Read the full Zio review

Score

Each row shows points earned of points available under the published rubric.

Glass Health

42of 100

Competitive

Zio

69of 100

Top-ranked
Score by dimension for Glass Health and Zio
DimensionGlass HealthZioDifference
FDA clearance0 / 1212 / 12-12
HIPAA / SOC2 / BAA6 / 100 / 10+6
EHR integrations (count)2.8 / 5.60 / 5.6+2.8
Top-3 EHR coverage (Epic / Oracle / Athena)3.4 / 4.80 / 4.8+3.4
Bidirectional write-back0 / 1.20 / 1.20
Peer-reviewed papers8.4 / 2121 / 21-12.6
RCT / meta-analysis / systematic review0 / 99 / 9-9
Funding & adoption signal8.4 / 128.4 / 120
Pricing transparency2.5 / 2.51.3 / 2.5+1.3
Years in market4.2 / 66 / 6-1.8

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

How scores are computed

Pricing

Glass Health

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Liten/an/aLimited scribing and clinical decision support. Carries ad sponsorships.
Starter$20n/aCarries ad sponsorships.
Pro$90n/aMost popular tier, ad-free.
Max$200n/aFor clinics. EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is available only on this tier.

Zio

TierMonthlyAnnualNotes
Enterprisen/an/aNo public price.

Evidence

Glass Health

FDA decisions

No FDA decision cited in our research as of October 26, 2026.

Peer-reviewed

1 PubMed record names Glass Health.

Community

1 post sourced: 0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative.

Zio

FDA decisions

Show 13 more

Peer-reviewed

5 PubMed records name Zio.

Compliance and integrations

Documented from each vendor’s own pages.

SpecGlass HealthZio
Free tierYesNo / unverified
HIPAANo / unverifiedNo / unverified
SOC 2 Type IINo / unverifiedNo / unverified
EHR integrationsEpic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, ElationNot specified
Founded20212006
HQUSUS

Scroll horizontally to see both columns.

Common questions

Open the full decision support comparison

Differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, drug interactions, evidence-grounded Q&A. The CDS landscape ranges from the UpToDate gold standard to physician-only OpenEvidence. We compared what clinicians actually use.